Disposed

Sajan v. The Chief Executive Officer

Madras HC5 Aug 2024WP(MD)/24916/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a mandamus directing the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board to register a mosque at Kalainagar, Madurai under the Wakf Act, 1995 and control its functioning. Board counsel undertook to consider the representation and pass orders within three months; the writ petition was disposed of on that submission.

What did the court decide?

Respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation dated 29.09.2023 and pass orders within three months.

Sajan Vs The Chief Executive Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.24916 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 05.08.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.24916 of 2023

Sajan.

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Wakf Board No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakaathi Nagar, Chennai – 600 001.

¶11

2.The Superintendent, 2^nd Floor, Mosque Building, Wakf Board No.1, Town Hall Road, Madurai – 625 001.

¶12

3.The President, Umal (Rali), Jumma Pallivasal, Kalai Nagar, Madurai. ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to register the Wakf namely The Umar (Rali) Jummah Masjid Pallivasal situated at Kalainagar, Madurai under the Wakf Act, 1995 and control the functioning of the same by the

¶14

1/3

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.(MD) No.24916 of 2023

¶17

Wakf Board by considering the representation dated 29.09.2023. For petitioner : Mr. SMA Jinnah For respondents : Mr.G.Chandrasekar

¶18

¶19

ORDER

¶20

This Writ Petition is filed directing the respondents 1 and 2 to register the Wakf namely, the Umar (Rali) Jummah Masjid Pallivasal, situated at Kalainagar, Madurai, under the Wakf Act, 1995 and control the functioning of the same by the Wakf Board by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 29.09.2023.

¶21

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 that the respondents 1 and 2 will consider the petitioner’s representation dated 29.09.2023 and the orders will be passed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶22

3.Recording the above submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No

¶23

costs.

¶24

Index : Yes / No 05.08.2024 Internet : Yes / No apd 2/3

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P.(MD) No.24916 of 2023

¶27

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

¶28

apd

¶29

W.P.(MD) No.24916 of 2023

¶30

05.08.2024

¶31

3/3

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Sajan v. The Chief Executive Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sajan v. The Chief Executive Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Karthikeyan Vs The Union of India

Prasath Lenin Devakar Vs The Union of India

B.Nithyanandan, Vs The Union of India

N Manimaran Vs The Assistant Commissioner of GST and Central Excise

Arul.R Vs The District Manager

Murugan .N Vs The Managing Director