Dismissed

Tirupathi v. The District Revenue Officer

Madras HC14 Oct 2024WP(MD)/23955/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In W.P(MD)No.23955 of 2024, the Madras High Court, Madurai Bench, dismissed a writ petition filed by Tirupathi seeking a mandamus to direct the Thasildar to conduct an enquiry. The court dismissed the petition because the Thasildar had already conducted the enquiry and rejected the patta request on 30.05.2024, with the petitioner granted liberty to challenge that order. No costs.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to challenge the Thasildar's proceedings rejected on 30.05.2024 in the manner known to law. No costs.

Tirupathi Vs The District Revenue Officer — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.23955 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 14.10.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

W.P(MD)No.23955 of 2024

¶7

Tirupathi ... Petitioner

¶8

¶9

1.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

¶10

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani Revenue, Palani, Dindigul District.

¶11

3.The Thasildar, Vedasendur Taluk, Dindigul District. ...Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the third respondent herein to conduct enquiry based on the proceedings of the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.10/2023/A7 dated 29.12.2023 and forward the same to the first respondent for

¶13

1/5

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P(MD)No.23955 of 2024

¶16

issue of patta in the name of the petitioner for the land situated in Survey No.176 in Vadamadurai Village, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District, within a time frame as stipulated by this Court.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sarvagan Prabhu, For Respondents : Mr.B.Saravanan Additional Government Pleader

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This writ petition is filed, seeking a Mandamus, to direct

¶20

the Thasildar, Vedasendur Taluk, Dindigul District, to conduct an enquiry, based on the proceedings of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani in Na.Ka.No.10/2023/A7 dated 29.12.2023.

¶21

2.Mr.B.Saravanan, learned Additional Government

¶22

Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents, on written instructions submits that the Thasildar, Vedasendur has already conducted an enquiry and an order has also been passed, rejecting the request of

¶23

this petitioner for grant of patta, in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.

¶24

356/2024/A4, dated 30.05.2024. A copy of the proceedings, dated

¶25

2/5

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P(MD)No.23955 of 2024

¶28

30.05.2024 is placed before this Court and also furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶29

3.Recording the submission of the learned Additional

¶30

Government Pleader that the request of this petitioner for grant of patta has been rejected by the third respondent in his proceedings, dated 30.05.2024, this writ petition is disposed of, with liberty to this petitioner to challenge the above proceedings in the manner known to law. No costs.

¶31

14.10.2024 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes Internet :Yes vrn

¶32

3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.P(MD)No.23955 of 2024

¶34

¶35

1.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

¶36

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani Revenue, Palani, Dindigul District.

¶37

3.The Thasildar, Vedasendur Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶38

4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

W.P(MD)No.23955 of 2024

¶40

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶41

vrn

¶42

Order made in W.P(MD)No.23955 of 2024

¶43

14.10.2024

¶44

5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Tirupathi v. The District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tirupathi v. The District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Kannusamy Vs Assistant Povident Fund

K.Rajagopal, Vs Assistant Provident Fund

M.Arulprakasam, S/O.Micheal Vs Assistant Providen Fund

Vijay @ Pambu Kulambu Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Anandhan Vs The District Revenue Officer

Abisegavalli Vs The District Collector