A.Sivaprakash v. The Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition under Article 226, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation for a badge licence, issue necessary notices, and pass a reasoned order after affording an opportunity of hearing within two weeks.
What did the court decide?
Directing respondents to consider petitioner's representation, issue notice, and pass order within two weeks after hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(MD)No.23459 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 04.10.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
W.P.(MD)No.23459 of 2024
A.Sivaprakash
... Petitioner
/Vs./
1.The Commissioner, Transport and Road Safety Department, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai 600 032.
2.The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Collectorate Compound, Sivagangai. ... Respondents
PRAYER:- Petition - filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to issue Badge Licence to the petitioner, LMV Licence issued by 2nd respondent dated 26.07.2021 DL No. TN 63 - 20210004553 and consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.09.2024.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a badge licence given pending criminal charges.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Sivaprakash
- respondent
The Commissioner, Transport and Road Safety Department
- respondent
The Regional Transport Officer, Sivagangai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court