Athiyaman v. The Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking mandatory sub-division of land and separate patta issuance was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh petition.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. No costs.
What the court decided
W.P.(MD)No.22411 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 29.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA
W.P.(MD)No.22411 of 2024
Athiyaman ... Petitioner
Vs
The Tahsildar, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondent
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to sub-divide the land in S.No. 80/1 in Urappanur Bit -1 Village, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District with an extent of 1 Acre 34 Cents and issue separate patta in the petitioner favour for an extent of 10 cents situate in the Southern Extreme of the Western 38 cents of the total 1 Acre 34 cents.
For Petitioner : Mr.Arun Kumaar For Respondent : Mr.A.Kannan Additional Government Pleader
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the withdrawal of the writ petition filed for issuance of a writ of Mandamus for sub-division of land and issuance of separate patta.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Athiyaman
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Thirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District
Coram
N.MALA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court