Allowed

Savithri v. The District Collector

Madras HC18 Sept 2024WP(MD)/22345/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenged a notice issued by Kumbakonam Municipal Corporation. Following its earlier order quashing a similar notice in a connected writ petition, the Court quashed the impugned notice and allowed the Corporation to act strictly under Section 128(2) of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998.

What did the court decide?

Impugned notice dated 28.08.2024 quashed; liberty to Corporation to act under Section 128(2), TN Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998; no costs.

Savithri Vs The District Collector — Municipal and Town Planning | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.22345 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 18.09.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

W.P(MD)No.22345 of 2024 and

¶7

WMP(MD)Nos.18931 and 18932 of 2024

Savithri

... Petitioner

vs.

The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.

¶12

The Tahsildar, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.

¶13

The Corporation Commissioner, Kumbakonam Municipal Corporation, Thanjavur District.

¶14

... Respondents

¶15

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the 3^rd respondent in Na.Ka.No.8677/2021/d1 dated 28.08.2024 and quash the same.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Maheswaran For R1 & R2 : Mr.S.P.Maharajan, Special Government Pleader

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Page No.1 of 4

¶19

W.P(MD)No.22345 of 2024

¶20

For R3 : Mr.M.Rajarajan

¶21

ORDER

¶22

( Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)

¶23

Mr.S.P.Maharajan, learned Special Government Pleader takes

¶24

notice for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.M.Rajarajan, learned counsel takes notice for the 3^rd respondent.

¶25

Similar notice was quashed by us in W.P(MD)No.21811 of 2024,

¶26

dated 12.09.2024. In view of the said order, the impugned notice dated 28.08.2024 is quashed reserving liberty to the Municipal Corporation to take action strictly in accordance with Section 128(2) of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998.

¶27

The Writ Petition is allowed on the above terms. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶28

(R.S.M, J.) (L.V.G, J.) 18.09.2024

¶29

Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No bala

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

Page No.2 of 4

¶32

W.P(MD)No.22345 of 2024

¶33

¶34

The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.

¶35

The Tahsildar, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.

¶36

The Corporation Commissioner, Kumbakonam Municipal Corporation, Thanjavur District.

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

Page No.3 of 4

¶39

W.P(MD)No.22345 of 2024

¶40

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

¶41

bala

¶42

ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.22345 of 2024 DATED : 18.09.2024 (6/12)

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.4 of 4

Savithri v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Savithri v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Venkatesh Sowrirajan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Kamal Mydeen Vs The Commissioner

R.Sasikumar Vs The Managing Director

M.Muthuvel Vs The District Collector

The District Collector Vs C. Shanmuga Sundaram

Swaminathan Vs The District Collector