Disposed

Senthilmurugan v. Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited

Madras HC12 Sept 2024WP(MD)/21657/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged a Chief Judicial Magistrate's Section 14 SARFAESI order enabling possession of his mortgaged dwelling house. Noting he had defaulted on earlier assurances but that the house is his only property, the court granted a structured repayment schedule: Rs.10 lakh in four weeks, balance in six monthly installments, with possession returned after three installments; default permits s

What the court decided

AI extract

Senthilmurugan Vs Piramal Capital and Housing Finance… — Banking and Recovery | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.21657 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 12.09.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.21657 of 2024

¶7

and

¶8

W.M.P.(MD)Nos.18290 and 18291 of 2024

¶9

Senthilmurugan, S/o.Subbarayan ... Petitioner

¶10

-vs-

¶11

1.Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited, (Formerly Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Limited), Represented by its Authorized Officer, Mr.R.Shanbaga Vignesh, Unit No.601, 6^th Floor, Amiti Building,

¶12

Agastya Corporation Park, Kamani Junction,

¶13

Opp. Fire Station, LBS Marg, Kulra (West), Mumbai – 400 070.

¶14

2.Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited, (Formerly Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Limited), The Branch Manager, Coimbatore Branch, No.171A and 171B, Raju Naidu Road, Sivanantha Colony, Coimbatore – 641 012.

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

_____________ Page 1 of 6_

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

PRAYER:

¶19

W.P.(MD)No.21657 of 2024

¶20

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the order in Crl.M.P.No.6372 of 2023 made on 10.11.2023 passed by the Hon'ble Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karur, quash the same and consequently, direct the respondent bank to remove lock and seal of the petitioner's property in Survey No.440/3 and 440/38, situated at K.P.Nagar 6^th Street, Plot No.7/ North Part Karur Town, Erode Road, Karur Taluk and District.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Kevinkaran For Respondents : Mr.P.Pethu Rajesh

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.]

¶24

Mr.P.Pethu Rajesh, learned counsel takes notice for the respondent

¶25

financial Institution.

¶26

2 . The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order of the learned

¶27

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karur, made under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 [hereinafter referred to as ''the SARFAESI Act''].

¶28

Page 2 of 6

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.(MD)No.21657 of 2024

¶31

3 . The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that after the order of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, the petitioner has paid certain amounts and a working arrangement was made between the respondent financial institution and the petitioner, for liquidating the entire debt. Since the petitioner could not meet the deadline, the financial institution has also taken possession of the property. He would, however, submit that the petitioner is ready to liquidate the loan, if he is given sometime.

¶32

4 . Mr.P.Pethu Rajesh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent financial Institution would submit that the dues as of today are Rs.41,85,144/- and there is no justification for the claim of the petitioner, since the financial Institution has postponed taking possession of the property for nearly a year from the date of order of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Karur, believing the assurance given by the petitioner.

¶33

5 . We have considered the rival submissions.

¶34

_____________ Page 3 of 6_

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P.(MD)No.21657 of 2024

¶37

6 . No doubt, the conduct of the petitioner has not been above board.

¶38

Even after obtaining an order under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, the financial Institution has chosen to give indulgence to the petitioner and offer to take back the money in installments. The same has not been availed of by the petitioner. However, considering the fact that the property is a dwelling house of the petitioner and it is his only property, we feel that the petitioner should be given an opportunity to repay the loan and retrieve the property. We, therefore, direct the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- within a period of four weeks from today. The remaining amount shall be paid in six consecutive equal monthly installments. The installments will commence after four weeks from today. The interest that accrues in the meantime and cost shall be paid along with the final installment. After payment of first three installments, the financial institution will

¶39

hand over the possession to the petitioner. In the event of default on any installment, the financial institution will have the right to not only proceed with the sale but also take possession of the property. This can be done without needing to approach the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate again, and the Institution may seek the assistance of local Police, if necessary.

¶40

_____________ Page 4 of 6_

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

W.P.(MD)No.21657 of 2024

¶43

7 . This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above directions. No

¶44

costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶45

NCC : No [R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.] Index : No 12.09.2024 smn2 Note:- Issue order copy on 13.09.2024.

¶46

_____________ Page 5 of 6_

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

W.P.(MD)No.21657 of 2024

¶49

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

¶50

smn2

¶51

W.P.(MD)No.21657 of 2024 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.18290 and 18291 of 2024

¶52

12.09.2024

¶53

_____________ Page 6 of 6_

¶54

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Senthilmurugan v. Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Senthilmurugan v. Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

E.Athisayakumar , Vs State of Tamil Nadu

The State of Tamil Nadu, Vs K. Balamurugan

Ganesan .O Vs The District Collector

Rosario Jayaseelan Vs Corporation of Madurai

P. Sivanraj Vs The District Collector

T.AnbuMurugan Vs Kamarunnisa Begum.K