The petitioner challenged the final key answer in a recruitment exam. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the prayer has become infructuous. The Court dismissed the petition as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.21456 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 16.10.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P.(MD)No.21456 of 2017
and
W.M.P.(MD)Nos.17727 & 17728 of 2017
A.Chris Roy
: Petitioner
Vs.
1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Rep. by its Secretary,
Higher Education Department,
Secretariat,
Chennai.
2.The Chairman,
Teachers Recruitment Board,
4th Floor, E.V.K.Sampath Maligai, College Road, Chennai – 6.
: Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the
W.P.(MD)No.21456 of 2017
records relating to the final key answer issued by the second respondent vide proceedings Nil dated Nil (published in the official website of TRB on 07.11.2017 and quash the same as illegal insofar as it relates to question No.81, 119, 128 and 136 are concerned and consequentially to direct the second respondent to award 7 more marks in respect of the above referred questions and consequently to consider the petitioner's candidature (Roll No.17PT08020991) for appointment to the post of Lecturers (Mechanical Engineering) in Government polytechnic Colleges.
For Petitioner : Mr.H.Mohammed Imran for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondent No.1 : Mr.T.Amjad Khan Government Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Mr.VR.Shanmugananthan Standing Counsel
O R D E R
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition has now become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.
W.P.(MD)No.21456 of 2017
2. In view of the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
16.10.2024
Index :Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes/No MR
W.P.(MD)No.21456 of 2017
To
W.P.(MD)No.21456 of 2017
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
MR
W.P.(MD)No.21456 of 2017
16.10.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Chris Roy
State of Tamil Nadu
Teachers Recruitment Board
Abdul Quddhose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
