Allowed

K. Palanisamy v. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison

Madras HC22 Oct 2024WP(MD)/21090/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court granted nine days of ordinary leave to a convicted prisoner under the POCSO Act pending a Full Bench decision on counting remand periods. The petitioner sought leave due to his mother's serious heart ailment. A heads-up to police for daily reporting during the leave period was issued.

What did the court decide?

Nine days ordinary leave granted from 28.10.2024 to 05.11.2024; daily police reporting mandated during interregnum.

K. Palanisamy Vs The Deputy Inspector General… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P(MD) No.21090 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Date: 22.10.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN and THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA

¶6

W.P(MD) No.21090 of 2024

K. Palanisamy

... Petitioner

The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons,

¶11

Prisons and Correctional Services Department,

¶12

Madurai Range,Madurai Central Prison Campus, New Jail Raod, Madurai

¶13

The Superintendent of Prison, Central Jail, New Jail Road, Madurai ... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of certiorarified mandamus and call for the records of the impugned order passed by the second respondent in No.E-314959/Tha.Ku.2/2024 dated 28.08.2024 to set aside the same and further direct the respondents 1 and 2 to extend the ordinary leave to my son from 04.09.2024 to 04.10.2024 for further 30 days

¶15

1/7

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P(MD) No.21090 of 2024

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.SMA.Jinnah

¶19

For Respondents : Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The writ petition has been filed the nature of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent dated 28.08.2024 seeking to set aside the same and direct the respondents to grant ordinary leave for the son of the petitioner namely Jothimurugan, C.P. No.2193 who had been confined at Central Prison,Madurai.

¶22

The son of the petitioner had been convicted by the Special Court for POCSO Act Cases, Dindigul in Spl.S.C. No. 108 of 2023 for the offence punishable under Section 10 of POCSO Act and sentenced to undergo seven years imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.75,000/-. Crl.A(MD) No. 150 of 2024 is pending.

¶23

2/7

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P(MD) No.21090 of 2024

¶26

The reasons stated for grant of leave is that the wife of the

¶27

petitioner/mother of the convict prisoner is suffering from serious heart ailment. We wanted a report from the Government Rajaji Hospital, Madurai in this regard .

¶28

A report had been received by the learned Additional Public

¶29

Prosecutor who had forwarded the same to this Court. The report is as follows:

¶30

w/o.Palanisamy residing door No.2 Narayasamy Das Nagar, Round road, Dindigul admitted in

¶31

Government Rajaji Hospital, Madurai IP No.58586 on 09.09.2024 with chief complaint of chest pain. She

¶32

is a known case of Diabetes Mellitus ,coronary artery disease, (Angioplasty) done for single vessel disease on 2019 under regular medication. Routine investigation sent. Cardiologist opinion obtained and

¶33

treated accordingly. Medical condition of the

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

3/7

¶36

W.P(MD) No.21090 of 2024

¶37

petitioner Type.2 Diabetes mellitus/coronory Angioplasty done at 2019) Diabetic kidney disease, patient treated conservatively , improved symptomatically and discharged on 13.09.2024”

¶38

5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner drew the attention of this Court to the earlier order passed by this Court in W.P(MD) No. 17228 of 20244 dated 19.08.2024 passed for the very same convict prisoner. This Court in view of the fact that a reference is pending before the Hon'ble Full Bench relating to whether the period of remand should be counted for the period undergone subsequent to the conviction for examination of grant of leave, had granted ordinary leave for a period of 12 days . It is contended that the medical condition of the mother of the convict prisoner is very serious and therefore ordinary leave may be granted.

¶39

6.Heard the learned Additional Pubic Prosecutor also.

¶40

4/7

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

W.P(MD) No.21090 of 2024

¶43

One of the objection raised by the learned Additional Public

¶44

Prosecutor is the ineligibility of the son of the petitioner to be granted ordinary leave, in view of the fact that he has not completed three years of sentence after conviction. It is also contended that the remand period cannot be taken into consideration inview of the specific rules available in Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982.

¶45

But, however reference is pending before the Hon'ble Full Bench of this Court on the issue, whether the period of remand could be counted or not.

¶46

9. In view of the nebulous situation and since the Hon'ble Full

¶47

Bench had not yet answered the issue, we would grant leave to maintain consistency with the earlier order of the Court and grant nine days ordinary leave to the son of the petitioner namely Jothimurugan,S/o. Palanisamy, C.P. No.2193 commencing from 28.10.2024@ 10.30 am., to 05.11.2024@ 5.00 pm., During the interregnum period the convict prisoner shall report before the Inspector of Police Thadikombu Police Station, Dindigul District daily at 10.30 am., without fail.

¶48

5/7

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶50

W.P(MD) No.21090 of 2024

¶51

10. Observing as above, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶52

(C.V.K., J.) (R.P, J.) 22.10.2024

¶53

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No aav

¶54

Note: Issue order copy on 24.10.2024

¶55

¶56

The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Prisons and Correctional Services Department,

¶57

Madurai Range,Madurai Central Prison Campus, New Jail Raod, Madurai

¶58

The Superintendent of Prison, Central Jail, New Jail Road, Madurai

¶59

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Copy to The Inspector of Police Thadikombu Police Station Dindigul District

¶60

6/7

¶61

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶62

W.P(MD) No.21090 of 2024

¶63

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. and R.POORNIMA, J.

¶64

aav

¶65

W.P(MD) No.21090 of 2024

¶66

22.10.2024

¶67

7/7

¶68

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

K. Palanisamy v. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K. Palanisamy v. The Deputy Inspector General of Prison

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karuppaiah Vs The Superintendent of Police

Yesu Balan Vs The Inspector of Police

Jothika Vs The Additional Chief Secretary to Government

Seeni @ Seenivasan Vs The Inspector of Police

Raman Vs The Inspector Of Police

Dhanalakshmi Vs The State of Tamil Nadu represented by