Disposed

Gurusamy v. The Commissioner

Madras HC16 Aug 2024WP(MD)/19421/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition filed to quash an order relating to tenancy proceedings. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal within four weeks and stayed coercive proceedings pending the outcome of such appeal.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file an appeal within four weeks; coercive proceedings stayed pending the appeal; writ petition disposed of.

Gurusamy Vs The Commissioner — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.19421 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 16.08.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

¶6

W.P(MD)No.19421 of 2024 and

¶7

W.M.P(MD)Nos.16510 & 16512 of 2024

¶8

Gurusamy ... Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.The Commissioner,

¶11

Hindu Religious Charitable Endowments Department, Chennai.

¶12

2.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious Charitable Endowments Department, Dindigul.

¶13

3.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious Charitable Endowments Department, Dindigul.

¶14

4.The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Kalahatheeswarar Thirukovil, Mullipadi, Dindigul District. ... Respondents

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/5

¶17

W.P(MD)No.19421 of 2024

¶18

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling the records relating to the proceedings of the third respondent made in Na.Ka.No. 2759/2024-1/A3, dated 18.07.2024 and quash the same and consequentially direct the respondents to receive the rent and treat the petitioner as a tenant and pass such further or other orders as this Court.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murali For R-1 to R-3 : Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan Additional Government Pleader For R-4 : Mr.V.Chandrasekar

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order, dated

¶22

18.07.2024, which is purportedly issued on the basis of the Joint Commissioner's order, dated 06.06.2024, which according to the petitioner has not been served.

¶23

2. Today, the learned Additional Government Pleader for the official respondents served the copy of the order, dated 06.06.2024. At this juncture, the learned Counsel for the petitioner after submitting for a brief while seeks liberty of this Court to challenge the order, dated 06.06.2024.

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

2/5

¶26

W.P(MD)No.19421 of 2024

¶27

3. Considering the above request, the petitioner is granted liberty to file an appeal within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the appeal is filed within the above period, the same shall be entertained without reference to limitation subject to complying with other conditions relating to appeal. Until the petitioner files an appeal or expiry of the period stipulated above for filing an appeal, i.e., four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order whichever is earlier, the respondents shall not proceed with any coercive proceedings. Appeal if filed within the stipulated period may be disposed of within a period of six months thereafter. It is open to the petitioner to seeks interim protection during pendency of appeal, if law so permits.

¶28

4. This writ petition stands disposed of with the above direction. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions stand closed.

¶29

16.08.2024

¶30

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

3/5

¶33

W.P(MD)No.19421 of 2024

¶34

¶35

1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious Charitable Endowments Department, Chennai.

¶36

2.The Joint Commissioner,

¶37

Hindu Religious Charitable Endowments Department, Dindigul.

¶38

3.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious Charitable Endowments Department, Dindigul.

¶39

4.The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Kalahatheeswarar Thirukovil, Mullipadi, Dindigul District.

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

4/5

¶42

W.P(MD)No.19421 of 2024

¶43

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

¶44

BTR

¶45

W.P(MD)No.19421 of 2024

¶46

16.08.2024

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

5/5

Gurusamy v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gurusamy v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Susee Agencies Vs The Commissioner Of Cgst and Central Excise

M/s.Raka Traders Vs The Commissioner of Cgst and Central Excise

Tvl.Maheswar Tiles Park Vs The Superintendent

S.Indira Vs The Regional Transport Authority cum District Collector

Mallika Dharmaraj Vs the District Registrar

18 Mottaiyar Pallivasal Trust And Dharga Committee Vs The Commissioner