Dismissed

Vasanthi @ Vasantha Devi v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC14 Jun 2024WP(MD)/19244/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR; the State reported that investigation was complete and a final report was filed before the concerned court, rendering the prayer infructuous. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

None granted; writ petition dismissed as infructuous, no costs, connected miscellaneous petition closed.

Vasanthi @ Vasantha Devi Vs the Inspector of Police — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.19244 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 14.06.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.19244 of 2021 and WMP(MD)No.15982 of 2021

¶7

1.Vasanthi @ Vasanthadevi

¶8

2.T.Senthilkumar ... Petitioners / Accused Nos.2 & 3

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.The State Represented by its, The Inspector of Police, Kunnathunadu Police Station, Ernakulam Rural, Kerala State. (Crime No.0801 of 2019) ... 1^st Respondent / Complainant 2.P.J.Paulose ... 2^nd Respondent / Defacto Complainant

¶11

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of FIR in Crime No. 801 of 2019 dated 02.09.2019 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same as illegal insofar as the petitioners are concerned.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Susikumar For R1 : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : Mr.S.Ramesh

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

1/4

¶15

W.P(MD)No.19244 of 2021

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

This petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.801 of 2019

¶18

dated 02.09.2019 on the file of the first respondent.

¶19

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State submitted that the respondent police has completed the investigation in Crime No.801 of 2019 and filed final report before the concerned Court. Hence, at this stage, the prayer sought for by the petitioners has become infructuous.

¶20

Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶21

14.06.2024

¶22

NCC : Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No dss

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

2/4

¶25

W.P(MD)No.19244 of 2021

¶26

To: -

¶27

The Inspector of Police, Kunnathunadu Police Station, Ernakulam Rural, Kerala State.

¶28

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

¶30

W.P(MD)No.19244 of 2021

¶31

A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.

¶32

dss

¶33

W.P(MD)No.19244 of 2021 and WMP(MD)No.15982 of 2021

¶34

14.06.2024

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

4/4

Vasanthi @ Vasantha Devi v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vasanthi @ Vasantha Devi v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Veera Raghavan Vs D.Vasantha Malliga

M/s.Hannah Joseph Hospital Pvt. Ltd., Vs P.S.Dhanalakshmi

S.Balasubramanian Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

R.Palaniammal Vs The Inspector of Police

John Kennady Vs The Inspector of Police

A.G.Eye Hospitals Private Limited Vs Lt.Col.Vijayalakshmi