Disposed

M. Muthiah v. Tthe District Collector

Madras HC12 Dec 2024WP(MD)/19128/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the District Collector to consider his representation dated 26.08.2019. The Special Government Pleader submitted that the representation was considered upon completion of Kudimaramathu work. The court closed the writ petition and connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition and connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs awarded.

M. Muthiah Vs Tthe District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P (MD).No.19128 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 12.12.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

W.P (MD).No.19128 of 2019 and W.M.P(MD)No.15482 of 2019

M.Muthiah

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Office of the Collector,

¶11

Madurai District.

¶12

2.The Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Madurai.

¶13

3.The Tahsildar, Melur, Madurai.

¶14

4.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Melur, Madurai.

¶15

5.The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Melur, Madurai.

¶16

6.The Area Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Melur, Madurai.

¶17

7.The President,

¶18

Neerenai Payanpaduthovur Sangam, Melur, Madurai. ...Respondents

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

1/4

¶21

W.P (MD).No.19128 of 2019

¶22

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.08.2019 in accordance with law.

¶23

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Abdul Mubeen For R1 to R6 : Mr.D.Gandhi Raj Special Government Pleader For R7 : No appearance

¶24

O R D E R

¶25

This writ petition has been filed to direct the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.08.2019 in accordance with law.

¶26

Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court.

¶27

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Special

¶28

Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 6, on instructions, would submit that the representation submitted by the petitioner has been considered by completion of Kudimaramathu work.

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

2/4

¶31

W.P (MD).No.19128 of 2019

¶32

Recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed. No

¶33

costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶34

Internet : Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order am

¶35

12.12.2024

¶36

¶37

1.The District Collector, Office of the Collector, Madurai District.

¶38

2.The Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Madurai.

¶39

3.The Tahsildar, Melur, Madurai.

¶40

4.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Melur, Madurai.

¶41

5.The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Melur, Madurai.

¶42

6.The Area Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Melur, Madurai.

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

3/4

¶45

W.P (MD).No.19128 of 2019

¶46

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

¶47

¶48

W.P (MD).No.19128 of 2019

¶49

12.12.2024

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

M. Muthiah v. Tthe District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M. Muthiah v. Tthe District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Sathish Vs M.Kannan

L.Prasath Vs Gopinath

Balamuralidaran, Vs S. Gangadharini

Muslim Pothu Jamath Vs the Inspector General of

J.Saravanakumar Vs the Joint Sub Registrar

Rajendrakumar.T.v Vs The District Collector