Allowed

Alwarsamy v. The District Collector

Madras HC9 Aug 2024WP(MD)/18665/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought demarcation and subdivision of property and issuance of a separate patta. The court noted a compromise decree had allotted the property jointly to the petitioner and two others. The writ was allowed, directing respondents to issue patta to all three persons after due enquiry.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to issue patta in the name of the petitioner, Iyyammal and Sonia Gandhi after due enquiry within eight weeks.

Alwarsamy Vs The District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.18665 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 09.08.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

¶6

W.P.(MD).No.18665 of 2024

Alwarsamy

.. Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District

¶11

2.The Tahsildar, Office of the Taluk Office, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District.

¶12

3.The Taluk Surveyor, Office of the Taluk Office, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District.

¶13

4.The Inspector of Police, Kalukumalai Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

¶14

5.Alwarsamy .. Respondents

¶15

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2^nd and 3^rd respondent to take necessary steps to demarcate and subdivide the

¶16

_________Page 1 of 4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.(MD) No.18665 of 2024

¶19

properties in survey no.176/27 to an extent of 4.36 cents situated at Pitchaithalaivanpatti Village , Kovilpatti Taluk, Thoothukudi District and issue separate patta in the name of the petitioner on the petitioner application dated 23.03.2023 and 14.11.2023 with a stipulated time in accordance with law.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Arun For R1 – R3 : Mr.B.Saravanan Additional Government Pleader For R4 : Mr.K.Sanjay Gandhi Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶21

ORDER

¶22

Though the prayer is to issue patta in the name of the petitioner, it is seen that in the compromise decree in O.S.No.160 of 2015 on the file of the Sub Court, Kovilpatti, the property in question has been allotted jointly in the name of the petitioner, Iyyammal and Sonia Gandhi.

¶23

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the said Iyyammal is his mother and the said Sonia Gandhi is his sister.

¶24

In view of the above, the respondents 2 and 3 are directed to

¶25

_________Page 2 of 4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P.(MD) No.18665 of 2024

¶28

issue patta in the name of all the three persons mentioned above after due enquiry within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶29

Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands allowed. No costs.

¶30

09.08.2024

¶31

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes gbg To

¶32

1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District

¶33

2.The Tahsildar, Office of the Taluk Office, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District.

¶34

3.The Taluk Surveyor, Office of the Taluk Office, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District.

¶35

4.The Inspector of Police, Kalukumalai Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

_________Page 3 of 4

¶38

W.P.(MD) No.18665 of 2024

¶39

P.T.ASHA, J.

¶40

gbg

¶41

W.P.(MD) No.18665 of 2024

¶42

09.08.2024

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

_________Page 4 of 4

Alwarsamy v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Alwarsamy v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saramariappan K Vs the State of Tamilnadu

P.Shebastian Vs State Rep. by

T.Vennila Vs The District Revenue Officer

P.Durga Devi Vs The Secretary

Malar Vs The Tahsildar

Shanthi Vs The Tahsildar