The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution as withdrawn by the petitioner.
Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED 06.08.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
W.P(MD)No.18163 of 2018
Chandrasekar
..Petitioner
Vs
6.Shanmugavel ..Respondents.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 2 and 3 to take action on te Petitioner’s Protest Petition as per the Circular of the first respondent in Letter No.41530/U1/2017, dated 8.11.2017 under Section 83 of the Registration Act, 1908.
2
For Petitioner :Mr.B.Prasanna Vinoth
For Respondents:Mr.M.Murugan
1 to 4 Govt.Advocate
ORDER
The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
06.08.2024
Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No NCC :Yes/No vsn
To
3.The Sub-Registrar,
3
Ettayapuram Registrar Office, Ettayapuram, Thoothukudi District.
4
N.SATHISH KUMAR.,J
vsn
ORDER MADE IN
W.P(MD)No.18163 of 2018
06.08.2024
5
6
7
8
9
Chandrasekar
1. The Inspector General of Registration, 2. The District Registrar, 3. The Sub-Registrar, 4. The Inspector of Police, 5. Muthu Udaiyar, 6. Shanmugavel
N. Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
