Dismissed

V.Irudhayaraj v. The Accountant General (a and E)

Madras HC24 Oct 2024WP(MD)/16290/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking direction to disburse retirement benefits and re-employment salary were dismissed by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court as infructuous after noting the petitioner's representation that the reliefs sought had became unavailing.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

V.Irudhayaraj Vs The Accountant General (a and E) — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD) Nos.16290 & 16291 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 24.10.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

W.P.(MD) Nos.16290 & 16291 of 2019

¶7

W.P.(MD) No.16290 of 2019:

V.Irudhayaraj

... Petitioner

-vs-

1.The Accountant General (A&E) O/o.The Accountant General (A&E) 361, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 018

¶12

2.Joint Director of Collegiate Education Tirunelveli Region Tirunelveli District-627 007

¶13

3.The Treasury Officer for DCRG District Treasury Office Tirunelveli-8

¶14

4.The Secretary St.Xavier's College (Autonomous) Palayamkottai Post Tirunelveli-627 002

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

Page 1 of 5

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.(MD) Nos.16290 & 16291 of 2019

¶19

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to disburse the petitioner's retirement benefits based on the representation sent by him on 07.05.2019

¶20

and 12.05.2019 within the time limit to be be stipulated by this Court.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Christopher For Respondents : Mr.P.Gunasekaran for R1 Mr.T.Amjad Khan Government Advocate for R2 & R3 Mr.K.Ragatheesh Kumar for M/s.Isaac Chambers for R4

¶22

W.P.(MD) No.16291 of 2019:

¶23

V.Irudhayaraj ... Petitioner

¶24

-vs-

¶25

1.The Accountant General (A&E) O/o.The Accountant General (A&E) 361, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 018 2.Joint Director of Collegiate Education Tirunelveli Region Tirunelveli District-627 007 3.The Secretary St.Xavier's College (Autonomous) Palayamkottai Post Tirunelveli-627 002 ... Respondents

¶26

_____________ Page 2 of 5_

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P.(MD) Nos.16290 & 16291 of 2019

¶29

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to disburse the salary to the

¶30

petitioner for his re-employment period from 01.08.2018 to 31.05.2019 based on the representation sent by him on 07.05.2019 and 12.05.2019 within the time limit that may be stipulated by this Honourable Court.

¶31

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Christopher For Respondents : Mr.P.Gunasekaran for R1 Mr.T.Amjad Khan Government Advocate for R2 Mr.K.Ragatheesh Kumar for M/s.Isaac Chambers for R3

¶32

C O M M O N O R D E R

¶33

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the reliefs sought for in these writ petitions have now become infructuous. He has addressed this Court through video conferencing.

¶34

Page 3 of 5

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P.(MD) Nos.16290 & 16291 of 2019

¶37

2. After recording the said statement, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

¶38

24.10.2024

¶39

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶40

krk

¶41

To: 1.The Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Tirunelveli Region, Tirunelveli District-627 007.

¶42

2.The Treasury Officer for DCRG, District Treasury Office, Tirunelveli-8.

¶43

Page 4 of 5

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

W.P.(MD) Nos.16290 & 16291 of 2019

¶46

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

¶47

krk

¶48

W.P.(MD) Nos.16290 & 16291 of 2019

¶49

24.10.2024

¶50

_____________ Page 5 of 5_

¶51

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

V.Irudhayaraj v. The Accountant General (a and E)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Irudhayaraj v. The Accountant General (a and E)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abraham Selvaraj Vs the Director of School

K.Karuppiah Vs the Secretary

K.Adaikkalam, Vs the Govt. of Tamil Nadu

K.Pandi Vs The Principal Secretary to Government

M.Packiam Vs The District Collector

A.Pasupathy Vs the Director of Collegiate Education