Dismissed

Thavasi Perumal v. the Joint Registrar of

Madras HC13 Feb 2024WP(MD)/15967/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition for mandamus filed to quash notices for auctioning property. Court dismissed petition as petitioner failed to avail an available scheme benefit due to delay, granting liberty to approach respondents before the scheme's deadline.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to approach respondents to avail benefit of settlement scheme before 13.03.2024; otherwise, respondents may proceed with demand.

Thavasi Perumal Vs the Joint Registrar of — Madras HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

WP(MD)No.15967 of 2015

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Dated: 13.02.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

WP(MD)No.15967 of 2015 and

¶7

WMP(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2015

¶8

Thavasi Perumal ... Petitioner

¶9

¶10

1.The Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societies,

¶11

Tiruchenthoor,

¶12

Thoothukudi Distict.

¶13

2.The Pragasapuram Rural Bank, No.O.726, Aathoor Bank, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus to call for the records on the file of the 1^st respondent pertaining to its proceedings bearing Na.Ma.No.160/2007-2008 dated 07.08.2015 published in Thina Thanthi on 11.08.2015 an to quash the same.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Herold Singh

¶16

For Respondents : Mrs.D.Farjana Ghousia,

¶17

Special Government Pleader

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

1/4

¶20

WP(MD)No.15967 of 2015

¶21

ORDER

¶22

The petitioner challenging the notice issued by the respondents for auctioning the petitioner's property has filed this writ petition.

¶23

2.The learned Counsel for the petitioner requested four months time to settle the dues.

¶24

3.The learned Special Government Pleader submits

¶25

that the petitioner is liable to pay a sum of Rs.8,67,875/-. The government vide GO.Ms.No.164, Co-Operation, Food and Consumer Protection Department dated 13.03.2024, granted three months time to settle amount and as such the very scheme itself is available only upto 13.03.2024. If the petitioner makes the payment on before 13.03.2024, then the amount would be settled as Rs.5,54,458/-. So far the petitioner has paid a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-. The petitioner cannot avail the benefit beyond the period. Therefore, the petitioner's request for time cannot be considered.

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/4

¶28

WP(MD)No.15967 of 2015

¶29

4.Recording the above submission, this writ

¶30

petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondents and avail the benefit before 13.03.2024. If the petitioner does not avail the benefit within the time, the respondents shall raise the demand and proceed further. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.

13.02.2024

Internet : Yes / No

DSK

1.The Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societies,

¶36

Tiruchenthoor, Thoothukudi Distict.

¶37

2.The Pragasapuram Rural Bank, No.O.726, Aathoor Bank, Thoothukudi District.

¶38

3/4

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

WP(MD)No.15967 of 2015

¶41

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶42

dsk

¶43

WP(MD)No.15967 of 2015

¶44

13.02.2024

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

4/4

Thavasi Perumal v. the Joint Registrar of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thavasi Perumal v. the Joint Registrar of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Government of India Vs M/s. Kern Enterprises Private Limited

Rajivkumar. P Vs The District Manager

Periasamy .S Vs The Commissioner

S Bharatha Gangathara Thilakar Vs the Commissioner

P.R.Papers Represented by its Proprietor Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer-2

M/s Madhu Filament Vs Assistant Commissioner (St) (Fac)