Disposed

Jeyachandran T M v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC16 Jul 2024WP(MD)/15934/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai bench directed the respondents to consider petitioners' representations regarding unpaid allowances and incorrect CPS deductions under G.O.Ms.No.293 of 2018 within four weeks. The petitions were disposed of without the court adjudicating the merits of the claims.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider petitioners' representations and pass final orders on merits within four weeks of order receipt.

Jeyachandran T M Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD)Nos.15934 to 15937 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 16.07.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA

¶6

W.P.(MD)Nos.15934 to 15937 of 2024 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.13857, 13870, 13871 & 13862 of 2024

¶7

Dr.T.M.Jeyachandran ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.15934 of 2024 Dr.N.Mohamed Ameerkhan ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.15935 of 2024 Dr.P.Ramachandran ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.15936 of 2024 Dr.B.Vinodhini ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.15937 of 2024

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort St. George Town, Chennai-600 009.

¶10

The Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Directorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Varadharajapuram Main Road, Teynampet, Chennai-600 006.

¶11

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶12

1/7

¶13

The Director of Medical Education, Directorate of Medical Education, 156, Poonamallee High Road, Chennai-600 031.

¶14

W.P.(MD)Nos.15934 to 15937 of 2024

¶15

The Dean, Ramanathapuram Medical College, Ramanathapuram,

¶16

Tamil Nadu-623 503. ... Respondents

¶17

COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representations of the Petitioners dated 26.06.2024 and implement G.O.Ms.No.293 of 2018, Health and Family Welfare Department, dated 18.06.2021, thereby enabling the petitioners to avail the unpaid allowance and rectify incorrect CPS deductions which they are entitled to within a time limit that may be fixed by this Court.

¶18

In all Writ Petitions

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramsundarvijayraj For Respondents : Mr.M.Siddharthan

¶20

Additional Government Pleader

¶21

2/7

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P.(MD)Nos.15934 to 15937 of 2024

¶24

COMMON ORDER

¶25

By consent of both the parties, these Writ Petitions are taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶26

2. Heard Mr.S.Ramsundarvijayraj, learned counsel

¶27

appearing for the petitioners and Mr.M.Siddharthan, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶28

3. The petitioners who are serving as Senior Resident at the

¶29

fourth respondent Medical College have preferred representations for

¶30

availing the unpaid allowances and in order to rectify the CPS deductions and also to implement G.O.Ms.No.293 of 2018, Health and Family Welfare Department, dated 18.06.2021. Since the said representations were not considered by the respondents so far, the petitioners are before this Court with these Writ Petitions.

¶31

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that

¶32

since there was discrepancies found in granting allowances as per

¶33

3/7

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

W.P.(MD)Nos.15934 to 15937 of 2024

¶36

G.O.Ms.No.293 of 2018, Health and Family Welfare Department, dated 18.06.2021 and CPS deductions were also found to be incorrect, the petitioners preferred representations.

¶37

5 . The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing

¶38

for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that the representations of the petitioners would be considered by the respondents in the light of G.O.Ms.No.293 of 2018, Health and Family Welfare Department, dated 18.06.2021, within a time frame fixed by this Court.

¶39

6 . In the light of the above submission, there shall be a

¶40

direction to the respondents herein to pass final orders on the representations of the petitioners, dated 26.06.2024 in the light of G.O.Ms.No.293 of 2018, Health and Family Welfare Department, dated 18.06.2021, on its own merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim of the petitioner and it is open to the respondents to consider the same on its own merits.

¶41

4/7

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

W.P.(MD)Nos.15934 to 15937 of 2024

¶44

7 . With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands

¶45

disposed of . No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶46

16.07.2024

¶47

NCC :yes/no Index :yes/no Internet:yes/no RM

¶48

5/7

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶50

W.P.(MD)Nos.15934 to 15937 of 2024

¶51

¶52

The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort St. George Town, Chennai-600 009.

¶53

The Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Directorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Varadharajapuram Main Road, Teynampet, Chennai-600 006.

¶54

The Director of Medical Education, Directorate of Medical Education, 156, Poonamallee High Road, Chennai-600 031.

¶55

The Dean, Ramanathapuram Medical College, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu-623 503.

¶56

6/7

¶57

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶58

W.P.(MD)Nos.15934 to 15937 of 2024

¶59

R.N.MANJULA, J.

¶60

¶61

W.P.(MD)Nos.15934 to 15937 of 2024

¶62

16.07.2024

¶63

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶64

7/7

Jeyachandran T M v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jeyachandran T M v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Shanmuganathan Vs The Secretary to the Government

S.Janani Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Deivendran .K Vs The Principal Secretary to Government

Sankar.K Vs The Chief Educational Officer

Pitchayammal Vs The Director of School Education

Duraipandi M Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer