The petitioner sought to quash a succession proceeding order. The bench held that a subsequent proceeding supplanted the impugned order, rendering the petition infructuous, and dismissed it.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous and the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.15353 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 12.06.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AA.NAKKIRAN
W.P.(MD)No.15353 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.12899 of 2020
1.P.Ramkumar
3.N.Ram Prakash
4.N.Rathna Prakash
... Petitioners
Vs.
1.The Executive Magistrate – Cum - Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruvhirappalli.
2.The Inspector of Police, Thillainagar Police Station, Thiruchirappalli.
3.Basheer Ahamed
10.Salimudeen 11.The Superintendent of Wakf, Trichy Circle, Trichy
1/4
W.P.(MD)No.15353 of 2020
(R11 is impleaded vide Court order, dated 30.03.2022 in WMP(MD).No.3990 of 2022 in WP(MD).No.15353 of 2020)
... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.No. A1 /4417/2018, dated 23.01.2020 issued by the first respondent and quash the same.
For Petitioners : Mr.B.Jameel Arasu
For respondents 1 and 2 : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
For respondents 3,5 & 6 : M/s. A. Jasima Yasmin
for M/s. Ajmal Associates
For respondents 4, 7 to 9 : No appearance
ORDER
Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned
counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that subsequent to the above said proceeding in Na.Ka.No. A1 /4417/2018, dated 23.01.2020, another proceeding was passed by the same first
2/4
W.P.(MD)No.15353 of 2020
respondent and hence, the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition has become infructuous.
adjudication in this Writ Petition and hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
12.06.2024
Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No trp
To
3/4
W.P.(MD)No.15353 of 2020
AA.NAKKIRAN,J
trp
W.P.(MD)No.15353 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.12899 of 2020
12.06.2024
P. Ramkumar Vincent Adaikalaraj N. Ram Prakash N. Rathna Prakash
Executive Magistrate – Cum - Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruvhirappalli
Inspector of Police, Thillainagar Police Station, Thiruchirappalli
Basheer Ahamed
AA Nakkiran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
