Dismissed

Selvarani.M v. Authorised Officer

Madras HC27 Feb 2024WP(MD)/1531/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench held that the writ petition seeking quashing of a notice fixing a sale sale was infructuous as the petitioner had settled the outstanding amount. The petitioner is directed to file a representation to the bank for return of documents.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of with liberty to petitioner to seek return of documents via representation to the bank.

Selvarani.M Vs Authorised Officer — Banking and Recovery | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.1531 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 27.02.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶7

W.P.(MD)No.1531 of 2024 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.1536 and 1538 of 2024

¶8

M.Selvarani ... Petitioner

¶9

-Vs-

¶10

Authorized Officer, Union Bank of India, No.3/288, K.K.Road, Sayalgudi, Ramanathapuram-623120.

¶11

... Respondent

¶12

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned sale notice dated 03.01.2024 fixing the sale on 25.01.2024 issued by the respondent herein and quash the same.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy, Senior Counsel, For Mr.C.Meenakshi Rama Prabhu For Respondent : Mr.V.Balasubramaniam

¶14

Page 1 of 4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.(MD) No.1531 of 2024

¶17

ORDER

¶18

[Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. ]

¶19

The sale notice issued by the respondent dated 03.01.2024, fixing the date of sale on 25.01.2024, is under challenge in this Writ Petition.

¶20

2.According to the petitioner, the petitioner has settled the entire outstanding amount of Rs.7,49,500/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Forty Nine Thousand and Five Hundred Only) to the respondent Bank and therefore, she is entitled for return of original documents.

¶21

3.Considering the nature of prayer sought for in this Writ Petition, we are of the view that the prayer has become infructuous. However, the petitioner claims that she has settled the entire outstanding amount. Therefore, the petitioner is at liberty to make a representation before the respondent Bank seeking for return of original documents and on receipt of such representation, the respondent Bank shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law.

¶22

Page 2 of 4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.(MD) No.1531 of 2024

¶25

4.With the above observation, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No

¶26

costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶27

[D.K.K., J.] & [R.V., J.] 27.02.2024

¶28

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶29

Yuva

¶30

Page 3 of 4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.(MD) No.1531 of 2024

¶33

D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J. AND R.VIJAYAKUMAR , J.

¶34

Yuva

¶35

W.P.(MD)No.1531 of 2024

¶36

27.02.2024

¶37

Page 4 of 4

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Selvarani.M v. Authorised Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Selvarani.M v. Authorised Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chinnadurai R Vs The District Collector

E.Mahudunan Vs The District Collector

The Additional Registrar General Vs a.M.Sundaravel

Packiyaraj @ Pandiyarajan Vs The District Collector

Kannadesan Theru Kudiyiruppor- Vs the Commissionier

T.Thangam @ Mayandi Vs The District Collector