decision of the petitioner Bank, the said Madhusoodana Perumal has filed a writ petition before the Principal Seat of this Court in WP No.14691 of 1999, for a Mandamus, forbearing the petitioner Bank from passing any order of retirement against him till he attained 60 years and sought for a direction to permit him to continue the service and he has also obtained an interim order. Pursuant to the interim order of this Court, he continued to work in the petitioner Bank for a period of 10 months. Thereafter, the writ petition filed by the said Madhusoodana Perumal/the employee of the petitioner Bank was dismissed on 20.11.2002 that this issue has to be raised only before the Labour Court as Industrial Dispute. Accordingly, the employee has raised I.D.No.112 of 2004 before the Labour Court, Tirunelveli. The Labour Court has passed an award on 27.10.2009, holding that the employee comes under the category of sub staff, eligible to serve upto his age of 60 years, thereby he is entitled for monetary benefits for a period of 16 months. The award passed by the Labour Court has not been challenged by the petitioner Bank. The employee has filed a claim petition in the month of August 2010 in C.P.No.53 of 2010 and that was also ordered on 19.08.2011 in favour of the employee. For enforcing these orders, an Execution Petition was filed by the employee in EP No.36
