C.Siva v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition under Article 226 challenging a license order regarding toilet fee collection was dismissed by the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court as infructuous due to the petitioner's own endorsement.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
What the court decided
W.P.(MD) No.14622 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 02.01.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
W.P.(MD) No.14622 of 2018 and
W.M.P(MD)Nos. 13172, 13173 and 13174 of 2018
C.Siva
... Petitioner
Vs.
- 1.The Commissioner, Bodinayakkanur Municipality, Bodinayakkanur.
- 2.The President, Sugamathi Self Help Group, Bodinayakkanur. .. Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating with the order of the first respondent made in Na.Ka.No.4530/2017/A2, dated 09.05.2018, pertaining to the license given to the 2nd respondent for collecting the fee from the users of toilet and latrine situated in Ward No.9, Pettai Street in Bodinayakkanur and quash the same as it is illegal and in consequence to direct the 1st respondent to receive the bid amount
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C. Siva
- respondent
The Commissioner, Bodinayakkanur Municipality
- respondent
The President, Sugamathi Self Help Group
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court