Dismissed

M/S. Sarjan Realities Limited, v. the Joint Commissioner

Madras HC28 Oct 2024WP(MD)/14418/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed the Writ Petition filed seeking quashing of an impugned order and cessation of interference with property possession, relying on a prior order in W.P(MD)No.5437 of 2018 that rendered further adjudication unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition dismissed; consequential directions to desist from interference not granted due to prior order.

M/S. Sarjan Realities Limited, Vs the Joint Commissioner — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.14418 of 2012

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 28.10.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

¶6

W.P(MD)No.14418 of 2012 and

¶7

M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012

¶8

M/s.Sarjan Realities Limited, Hadapsar,

¶9

Pune – 411028, Represented by its Authorized Signatory

¶10

... Petitioner

¶11

Vs.

¶12

1.The Joint Commissioner, Land Reforms, Tirunelveli.

¶13

2.The Tahsildar, Radhapuram Taluk, Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District.

¶14

3.The Sub Inspector of Survey (Land Reforms), C/o.The Joint Commissioner, Land Reforms,

¶15

Tirunelveli.

¶16

4.M.Nagarajan

¶17

(R.4 is impleaded vide order of

¶18

this Court dated 12.02.2013)

¶19

... Respondents

¶20

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

W.P(MD)No.14418 of 2012

¶23

Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the first Respondent relating to Pro.No.C4/1008/2008 dated 25.10.2012, to quash the same and issue consequential directions to the respondents to desist from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the landed property in S.No.1465/3 measuring 6.83 Acres, in Veepilankulam Village, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

¶24

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ravi

¶25

For Respondents : Mr.D.S.Nedunchezian Government Advocate for R.1 to R.3

¶26

ORDER

¶27

In view of the order passed in W.P(MD)No.5437 of 2018, no further order is required in this Writ Petition. This Writ Petition stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶28

28.10.2024

¶29

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No MGA

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

2/4

¶32

W.P(MD)No.14418 of 2012

¶33

¶34

1.The Joint Commissioner, Land Reforms, Tirunelveli.

¶35

2.The Tahsildar, Radhapuram Taluk, Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District.

¶36

3.The Sub Inspector of Survey (Land Reforms), C/o.The Joint Commissioner, Land Reforms, Tirunelveli.

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

3/4

¶39

W.P(MD)No.14418 of 2012

¶40

P.T.ASHA, J.

¶41

MGA

¶42

W.P(MD)No.14418 of 2012 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012

¶43

28.10.2024

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

4/4

M/S. Sarjan Realities Limited, v. the Joint Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Sarjan Realities Limited, v. the Joint Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Muniasamy Vs Karuppayyee Devi

Sendukodi.D Vs The Thasildar

Nalinam Vs P.N.Sridhar IAS

M/s.Palladam Cetragani Realty Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Land Administration

Prabakaran Vs The District Collector

R.Bala Krishnaveni Vs the Commissioner of Land