40. Section 36 of the Act empowers the Registrar to take action against the delinquent to disqualify him permanently from holding in future any office in any registered Society, but, before taking such action, an enquiry under Section 81 or inspection under Section 82 should be undertaken to find out whether a member of a Board has misappropriated or fraudulently retained any money or other property or been guilty of breach of trust in relation to the Society. Admittedly, in the present case, enquiry was held by appointing one Mr.S.Murugesan, Cooperative Sub-Registrar, as Enquiry Officer, who, in turn, admittedly submitted his report on 28.04.2014 to the third respondent. But, unfortunately, a copy of the said report has not been furnished to the petitioner. Admitting non-furnishing of the report to the petitioner, learned counsel for the fourth respondent stated that there is no provision under the Act to furnish a copy of the report made under Section 81 of the Act. Such an contention of the learned counsel for the fourth respondent / approach of the second respondent in superseding the Board is erroneous, in the light of sub-section 2 of Section 36, which categorically says that no person shall be disqualified or removed under sub-section (1) of Section 36 without being given an opportunity of making his representation. For, while interpreting sub-section 2 of Section 36, this Court in Vallipattu's case (cited supra) has rightly held that the Registrar is duty bound to communicate
