3.The third respondent has purchased a house plot bearing NO.9 in T.S.No.560-A/1A situated at Chettinaickanpatti Village Ward No.II, Dindigul Town by registered sale deed, dated 30.5.1995 vide Registration NO.814/1995. The third respondent is none other than the Petitioner’s brother. Apart from that, the Petitioner’s other brothers had also purchased the adjacent three house plots .Thereafter, the Petitioner’s brothers and sister executed a power of attorney in favour of the Petitioner in order to develop those plots, dated 7.2.2011.Accordingly, the Petitioner had developed the subject property namely, four housing plots by construction of multi storied apartments with 15 tenaments. While being so, the third respondent had cancelled the General Power of attorney unilaterally by cancellation deed, dated 9.4.2019 vide document No.1012 of 2019. In respect of his share, namely 1/4th share of the entire property, now it is under challenge in this Writ Petition. In fact, the Petitioner had already filed a suit in O.S.No.31 of 2021, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Dindigul for annulling the cancellation of General Power of Attorney and the cancellation of General Power of attorney executed by the third respondent is pending as of now. Further, the power of attorney was cancelled unilaterally. Therefore, if the power of attorney is coupled with any interest, then the disputed question of facts would arise and it has to be dealt with by let in evidence only before the civil Court. At the same time, this
