Dismissed

R.Jeyasundari v. the Director

Madras HC5 Dec 2024WP(MD)/12608/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a transfer counseling order. On hearing, the court was informed that the petitioner had already been transferred, rendering the petition infructuous. The court dismissed the petition and closed connected miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions closed; no costs.

R.Jeyasundari Vs the Director — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.12608 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 05.12.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

W.P(MD)No.12608 of 2019 and

¶7

WMP(MD) Nos.9373, 9374 & 16110 of 2019

¶8

R.Jeyasundari ... Petitioner

¶9

¶10

1.The Director, Adi-Dravidar Welfare Department, Chepauk, Chennai-5.

¶11

2.The Director, Tribal Welfare Department, Chepauk, Chennai-5.

¶12

3.The District Adi Dravidar Welfare Officer, O/o. the District Adi Dravidar Welfare Office, Collectorate, Trichy.

¶13

4.The District Project Officer, O/o. the District Project Officer, Thurayur, Trichy. ...Respondents

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

PRAYER:

¶17

W.P(MD)No.12608 of 2019

¶18

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in his impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.No.Pa Mey/E1/5189/2018-3 dated 09.05.2019 and quash the same as illegal insofar as the petitioner is concerned.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.H.Mohammed Imran for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

The petitioner, who was working as a Secondary Grade

¶22

Teacher in Adi Dravidar Elementary School, Thiruvasi, Manachanallur Taluk, Trichy has filed this writ petition challenging the transfer counseling, scheduled on 28.05.2019.

¶23

2.Today( 05.12.2024), when this writ petition is taken up

¶24

for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits

¶25

that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has now become infructuous as the petitioner has already been transferred. The learned counsel has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶26

2/4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P(MD)No.12608 of 2019

¶29

3.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel

¶30

for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶31

05.12.2024

¶32

NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes vrn To

¶33

1.The Director, Adi-Dravidar Welfare Department, Chepauk, Chennai-5.

¶34

2.The Director, Tribal Welfare Department, Chepauk, Chennai-5.

¶35

3.The District Adi Dravidar Welfare Officer, O/o. the District Adi Dravidar Welfare Office, Collectorate, Trichy.

¶36

4.The District Project Officer, O/o. the District Project Officer, Thurayur, Trichy.

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

3/4

¶39

W.P(MD)No.12608 of 2019

¶40

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶41

vrn

¶42

Order made in W.P(MD)No.12608 of 2019 and WMP(MD) Nos.9373, 9374 & 16110 of 2019

¶43

05.12.2024

¶44

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.Jeyasundari v. the Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Jeyasundari v. the Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muthurasi Ganesan Vs the Chairman

Nagarethinam.K Vs The Chairman, Board of Governors

Jeyasekar. T Vs The Principal Secretary to Government

K.Virumandi,(Police Constable Vs the Director General of

Sathiya Rooban.R Vs The Superintendent of Police

S.Gurunathan Vs The Managing Director