Karuppasamy v. The Director
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner questioned illegal mining by 6th respondent. Court disposed petition as mining stopped and lease expired after Collector affidavit.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed with no order as to costs.
What the court decided
W.P.(MD)No.12489 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 14.10.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.(MD)No.12489 of 2023 and
W.M.P.(MD)No.19987 of 2024
Karuppasamy ... Petitioner
-vs-
1.The Director, Department of Geology and Mines, O/o. the Department of Geology and Mines,
Alanthur Road,
Guindy Industrial Estate, Chennai-600 032.
2.The Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mines, O/o the Department of Geology and Mines,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ application for mandamus to stop illegal mining needs to be disposed of since alleged activities ceased.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Karuppasamy
- respondent
The Director, Department of Geology and Mines
- respondent
VNP.Gomathi Sankaranarayanan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court