Dismissed

V. Nathaniel v. the Inspector General of

Madras HC18 Nov 2024WP(MD)/12240/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition seeking mandamus to compel registration of a settlement deed without No Objection Certificates is dismissed on merits as the petition has become infructuous due to subsequent orders by the Sub-Registrar returning the documents and refusing registration.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous due to subsequent orders returning documents and refusing registration.

V. Nathaniel Vs the Inspector General of — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD).No.12240 of 2015

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 18.11.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶6

W.P.(MD).No.12240 of 2015

¶7

V.Nathaniel ...Petitioner

¶8

¶9

1.The Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, Chennai.

¶10

2.The Sub-Registrar, Sub-Registrar Office, Boothapandi, Kanyakumari District.

¶11

3.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Chennai.

¶12

4.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent herein to register the pending Settlement Deed (P.201500059) dated 01.07.2015 executed by the petitioner in favour of his son N.Dennis in respect of 3 ½ cents of land comprised in New

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

¶15

W.P.(MD).No.12240 of 2015

¶16

S.No.470/9 (Old S.No.1252-B) of Azhagiyapandiapuram Village, Thovalai Taluk, Kanyakumari District, without insisting for No Objection Certificate from the respondents 3 and 4 herein and release the same forthwith.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.K.K.Udayakumar For Mr.A.Rahul

¶18

For R-1 and R-2 : Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader

¶19

For R-3 and R-4 : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

In view of the subsequent orders passed by the second respondent returning the documents and refusing registration, the Writ Petition has become infructuous.

¶22

Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous.

¶23

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶24

18.11.2024

¶25

NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no Nsr

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶27

2/4

¶28

W.P.(MD).No.12240 of 2015

¶29

To:

¶30

1.The Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, Chennai.

¶31

2.The Sub-Registrar, Sub-Registrar Office, Boothapandi, Kanyakumari District.

¶32

3.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Chennai.

¶33

4.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Nagercoil,

¶34

Kanyakumari District.

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

¶36

W.P.(MD).No.12240 of 2015

¶37

K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

¶38

Nsr

¶39

W.P.(MD).No.12240 of 2015

¶40

18.11.2024

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

V. Nathaniel v. the Inspector General of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V. Nathaniel v. the Inspector General of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baskaran. v Vs The Commissioner

A.v.Rajendran Vs the Inspector General of

Mahendran Vs the District Collector

N.Suviseshamuthu Vs the Inspector of General of

T.Chelladurai Vs the Inspector General of

Smt. Gomathi, Vs the Inspector General