Allowed

Manoj Kumar v. The Additional Superintendent of Police (Prohibition)

Madras HC3 Jun 2024WP(MD)/11051/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition under Article 226 was dismissed in the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. The petitioner sought release of his seized two wheeler. The High Court directed its release to the respondent authorities.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to release the seized Hero Splendor two wheeler bearing Reg.No. TN 65 AH 2318 to the petitioner within one week from today.

Manoj Kumar Vs The Additional… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.11051 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 03.06.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.11051 of 2024

Manoj Kumar

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Additional Superintendent of Police (Prohibition), Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

¶11

2.The Inspector of Police, Rameswaram Temple Police Station, Ramanathapuram.

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to release the petitioner’s two wheeler, Hero Splendor bearing Reg.No.TN 65 AH 2318 by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 19.03.2024.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Veerakumar For respondents : Mr.S.Manikandan Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶15

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

ORDER

¶19

W.P.(MD) No.11051 of 2024

¶20

This Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the time of admission

¶21

itself, after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents.

¶22

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondents would submit that the accused in Crime No.29 of 2023 on the file of the second respondent, dated 15.09.2023 has died during the pendency of the investigation. Hence, the charge sheet was abated.

¶23

Considering the above submission, the respondents are directed to

¶24

release the seized two wheeler viz., Hero Splendor bearing Reg No.TN 65 AH 2318 to the petitioner within a period of one week from today.

¶25

This Writ Petition is allowed, with above direction. No costs.

¶26

Index : Yes / No 03.06.2024 Internet : Yes / No apd

¶27

2/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P.(MD) No.11051 of 2024

¶30

¶31

1.The Additional Superintendent of Police (Prohibition), Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

¶32

2.The Inspector of Police, Rameswaram Temple Police Station, Ramanathapuram.

¶33

3/4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

W.P.(MD) No.11051 of 2024

¶36

C.SARAVANAN, J.

¶37

apd

¶38

W.P.(MD) No.11051 of 2024

¶39

03.06.2024

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

4/4

Manoj Kumar v. The Additional Superintendent of Police (Prohibition)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Kumar v. The Additional Superintendent of Police (Prohibition)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Prashanth M R Vs State Rep.by

K.Kumaresh Babu Vs R.Raja

K.Kumaresh Babu Vs R.Raja

V.S.B. Engineering College Vs The District Collector

M.Abdul Nazeer Vs The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board

Periyasamy Gounder Vs The Commissioner