Disposed

Mohamed Thaha v. The District Collector

Madras HC22 Oct 2024WP(MD)/10227/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged non-disposal of his representation regarding seized election funds. Court directed respondents to inform petitioner about the transfer to Income Tax and granted liberty to apply for funds' return.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to furnish particulars of amount transfer to Income Tax Department within one week. Liberty granted to petitioner to approach Income Tax Department.

Mohamed Thaha Vs The District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.10227 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 22.10.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.10227 of 2024

¶7

Mohamed Thaha ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The District Collector, Office of the Collectorate Building, Tenkasi District.

¶10

2.The Project Manager, District Rural Development Agency, Office of the Collectorate Building, Tenkasi District.

¶11

3.The Detaining Officer, Block Development Officer, Kuthukal Valasal, Tenkasi District. .... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to look into the petitioner's representation dated 08.04.2024 and dispose the same with accordance with law within time frame as fixed by this Court.

¶13

1/6

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.(MD)No.10227 of 2024

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.D.S.Haroon Rasheed For Respondents : Mr.D.Sadiq Raja, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 & R2 Mr.C.Satheesh for R3

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.04.2024 and dispose the same in accordance with law within the time frame as fixed by this Court.

¶19

2. It is the case of the writ petitioner that the petitioner doing the business of gold smith at Tenkasi District. In order to purchase the gold jewels,

¶20

the petitioner's employee one Syed Ali has carried an amount of Rs.35 lakhs, during the general election 2024. While conducting the vehicle checkup, the said amount was seized by the 1^st respondent from the petitioner's employee. Though the petitioner has also produced the proof for the source of income in respect of the said amount, the respondents instructed the petitioner to approach the collectorate building. The petitioner has also approached the Collectorate building and produced all the documents. Even thereafter, no fruitful result arrayed at and

¶21

2/6

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P.(MD)No.10227 of 2024

¶24

the amount is still kept in the custody of the 2^nd respondent. In this regard, the petitioner has made a representation on 08.04.2024. However, the same was not considered by the respondents. Hence, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition.

¶25

3. Whereas, it is the contention of the respondents in the counter affidavit that the amount has been sent to the office of the Assistant District Regional Officer (Election), Income Tax Department, Tenkasi on 21.03.2024. But the Income Tax Department was not made as a party in this Writ Petition and therefore, the petitioner cannot seek any relief.

¶26

4. Considering the same, this Court directs the respondents to give full particulars to the petitioner with regard to the disburse of the amount to the Assistant District Regional Officer (Election), Income Tax Department, Tenkasi, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On furnishing the said particulars, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the concerned Income Tax Department and file a necessary application for return of the amount by producing all the necessary documents. Based on the order to be passed by the concerned authority, the petitioner can work out his remedy in the manner known to law.

¶27

3/6

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P.(MD)No.10227 of 2024

¶30

5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall

¶31

be no order as to costs.

¶32

22.10.2024

¶33

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No

¶34

vsm

¶35

4/6

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

W.P.(MD)No.10227 of 2024

¶38

¶39

1.The District Collector, Office of the Collectorate Building, Tenkasi District.

¶40

2.The Project Manager, District Rural Development Agency, Office of the Collectorate Building, Tenkasi District.

¶41

3.The Detaining Officer, Block Development Officer, Kuthukal Valasal, Tenkasi District.

¶42

5/6

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

W.P.(MD)No.10227 of 2024

¶45

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶46

vsm

¶47

W.P.(MD)No.10227 of 2024

¶48

22.10.2024

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶50

6/6

Mohamed Thaha v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohamed Thaha v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Meenachiapuram Nadar Uravinmurai Vs The District Registrar

Pechiammal .B Vs The Superintendent Engineer

Suriyadeepan Vs The Additional Executive Engineer

Bavapriya Vs The Sub Registrar

R.Saravanan Vs The Managing Director

Paul Rodrigo. T Vs The Administrative Committee