marks and, consequently, these trade marks remain on the register as on date. By relying on the judgment dated 16.02.2024 of a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Motwane Private Limited v. Registrar of Trade Marks and another, Writ Petition (L) No.30537 of 2023(Motwane), he contends that the Bombay High Court concluded that the effect of the lapse on the part of the Registrar of Trade Marks to issue notice under sub-section (3) of Section 25 of the Trade Marks Act is that the registered proprietor would be entitled to make an application for renewal as long as the mark remains on the register of trade marks. He also relies upon an order of this Court in M/s. V.A.Mishra & Sons v. The Registrar of Trade Marks, W.P.(IPD) No.16 of 2024, order dated 01.07.2024, wherein this Court permitted the petitioner therein to apply for renewal in view of the failure of the Registrar of Trade Marks to issue notice under sub-section (3) of Section 25.