Writ petition challenging suspension order. Court directed the Tahsildar to consider the petitioner's representation for revocation of suspension within four weeks in light of GO.Ms.No.81 and pass meritorious orders. Petition disposed of.
Direction to consider representation and pass orders within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.9819 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.08.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
W.P.No.9819 of 2024
A.Mujibur Rahman ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Tahsildar, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District 2.The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Cuddalore (2nd respondent suo motu impleaded as per order dated 12.04.2024 in WP.No.9819 of 2024) ..... Respondents
Prayer :
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation dated 23.01.2023 and review the order of suspension passed in Na.Ka.No.A3/2560/2022 dated 07.07.2022 to reinstate the petitioner into service as Village Assistant with all service and monetary benefits in the light of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India 2015(7) SCC 291 within a time limit that may be specified by this Court and also based on
1/5
W.P.No.9819 of 2024
the GO.Ms.no.81 Human Resources Management (M) Department dated 04.08.2022.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Elumalai
For Respondents : Mr.S.Arumugam, Government Advocate
ORDER
This writ petition is filed for direction to the first respondent
to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 23.01.2023 seeking to revoke the order of suspension dated 07.07.2022.
2/5
W.P.No.9819 of 2024
memo so far.
There shall be no order as to costs.
02.08.2024
Neutral citation: Yes/No Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order lok
Note: Issue order copy on or before 18.11.2024
W.P.No.9819 of 2024
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
lok
To 1.The Tahsildar, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District 2.The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Cuddalore
W.P.No.9819 of 2024
W.P.No.9819 of 2024
02.08.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suspension order dated 07.07.2022 against the petitioner requires review and revocation in light of pending investigation and representations.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of IndiaReferred
Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India 2015(7) SCC 291 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Mujibur Rahman
The Tahsildar, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District
The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Cuddalore
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
