3.The order indicating that the Director General of Police should enquire into the matter and take necessary action, cannot be understood as a recommendation of the Commission on merits. Admittedly, none of the respondents were called. The present writ petition is filed not only to quash the proceedings dated 10.06.2013, but also to give further direction to the Director General of Police to enquire into the matter as observed by the State Human Rights Commission. Since the order is not a recommendation which should follow after a consideration of the complaint on merits, the observation only indicates that the complaint ought to have been enquired by the Director General of Police and not by the Commission. It is also to be noted that the petitioner has approached this Court nearly 11 years after the order of the State Human Rights Commission. In the said circumstances, this Court is unable to entertain this writ petition.