Disposed

D.Ashok kumar v. The Commissioner

Madras HC29 Oct 2024WP/9564/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition sought a mandamus to dispose of a representation seeking action against the fourth respondent for running an unauthorised lodge. The court held that after five years the representation could not be considered but permitted a fresh representation on fresh cause of action, and disposed of the petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to submit a fresh representation on fresh cause of action.

D.Ashok kumar Vs The Commissioner — Municipal and Town Planning | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.9564 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 29.10.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

W.P.No.9564 of 2020

M.Ashok kumar

.... Petitioner

1.The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Chennai-600 003.

¶11

2.The Commissioner of Police, Vapery, Chennai- 600 007. 3.The Zonal Manager, Zonal Office-IV, Chennai Corporation Zonal Office, Alandur Chennai-600016.

¶12

4. Sabu Stephen

¶13

..... Respondents

¶14

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose of the representation dated 14.08.2019 within the time frame fixed by this Court.

¶15

For Petitioner : Ms.V.Mohanapriya For R1 to R3 : Mrs.S.Vanitha Joice Rani

¶16

ORDER

¶17

Page 1 of 4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

W.P.No.9564 of 2020

¶20

This Writ Petition has been filed for a direction, directing the first

¶21

respondent to dispose of the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 14.08.2019, seeking necessary action against the fourth respondent for running an unauthorised lodge.

¶22

It is seen that, after a period of five years, the representation submitted by the petitioner cannot be considered. However, the petitioner is at liberty to submit fresh representation on fresh cause of action, if so advised.

¶23

With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of.

¶24

No costs.

¶25

29.10.2024

¶26

Internet: Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order Lpp To

¶27

1.The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Chennai-600 003.

¶28

2.The Commissioner of Police, Vapery,

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Page 2 of 4

W.P.No.9564 of 2020

Chennai- 600 007.

3.The Zonal Manager, Zonal Office-IV, Chennai Corporation Zonal Office, Alandur Chennai-600016.

¶34

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J,

¶35

Lpp

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 3 of 4

W.P.No.9564 of 2020

W.P.No.9564 of 2020

29.10.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 4 of 4

D.Ashok kumar v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Ashok kumar v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.K.Jeevanantham Vs the Presiding Officer

V.Rajmohan Vs The Principal Secretary

E.Arumugam Vs The Registrar of Co-Operative Societies

A.Arthur Robert Vs The Commissioner

M.Durdana Vs the Commissioner

M.Durdana Vs the Commissioner