Dismissed

Tvl.Sampooranam Hosieries Impex Pvt. Ltd. v. The Assistant Commissioner (St)(Fac)

Madras HC23 Feb 2024WP/9153/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed the Writ Petition filed by a trading firm against Assistant Commissionsers, as the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition intending to utilize the State Government's Samadhan Scheme for resolution under the TNVAT Act.

What did the court decide?

None granted. Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

Tvl.Sampooranam Hosieries Impex Pvt… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P. No.9153 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 23.02.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

¶6

W.P. No.9153 of 2021 and

¶7

W.M.P. No.9681 of 2021

¶8

Tvl.Sampooranam Hosieries Impex Private Limited, Represented by its Director, S.Venkatasubramanian, No.4/57, Muthu Goundenpudur (P.O.), Sulur (via), Coimbatore -641 406.

¶9

..Petitioner

¶10

Vs.

¶11

1.The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC), Karumathampatti Assessment Circle, Tirupur-II.

¶12

2.The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Mettur Road-Erode Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Building, No.1, Brough Road, Erode-638 001.

¶13

3.The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Tirupur North II Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Building, Kumaran Road, Tirupur-638 601.

¶14

4.The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Palladam-I Assessment Circle, No.10, Pollachi Road, Palladam- 641 664.

¶15

..Respondents

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

Page 1 of 4

¶18

W.P. No.9153 of 2021

¶19

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the files of the 1^st Respondent in TIN:33222462267/2014-15 dated 21.01.2021 and quash the same.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Thirumalai

¶21

For Respondents : Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran Government Advocate ORDER

¶22

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for

¶23

the petitioner sought the permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition as the petitioner is inclined to file an application under Samadhan Scheme, announced by the State Government to settle the pending disputes arising under the TNVAT Act, 2006. He has also submitted a letter to that effect.

¶24

Recording the same, the writ petition stands dismissed as

¶25

withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶26

23.02.2024

¶27

Speaking (or) Non Speaking Order Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No mka

¶28

Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P. No.9153 of 2021

¶30

To:

¶31

1.The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC), Karumathampatti Assessment Circle, Tirupur-II.

¶32

2.The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Mettur Road-Erode Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Building, No.1, Brough Road, Erode-638 001.

¶33

3.The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Tirupur North II Assessment Circle, Commercial Taxes Building, Kumaran Road, Tirupur-638 601.

¶34

4.The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Palladam-I Assessment Circle, No.10, Pollachi Road, Palladam- 641 664.

¶35

Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P. No.9153 of 2021

¶37

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

¶38

mka

¶39

W.P. No.9153 of 2021 and W.M.P. No.9681 of 2021

¶40

23.02.2024

¶41

Page 4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Tvl.Sampooranam Hosieries Impex Pvt. Ltd. v. The Assistant Commissioner (St)(Fac)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tvl.Sampooranam Hosieries Impex Pvt. Ltd. v. The Assistant Commissioner (St)(Fac)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Bairavi Agencies, Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St)

G.Sekar Vs Commissioner

M/s.M.a.K. Hotels and Resorts Private Limtied Vs The Municipal Commissioner

P.Ravi Vs The Commissioner

Madras Craft Foundation society Vs Commissioner of Income Tax

M/s.Padmavathi Srinivasa Vs The Joint Commissioner of GST