The High Court at Madras dismissed a writ petition filed for quashing records regarding pensionary benefits after the counsel for the petitioner sought and was granted leave to withdraw the petition.
Withdrawal of writ petition allowed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.8454 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.06.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.8454 of 2024
M.K.Manoharan
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the second respondent in Na.Ka.N.L7/4949/2022 dated 01.02.2024, quash the same and to direct the respondents to disburse all retiral and pensionary benefits of the petitioner without any recovery nor reduction in pay along with interest on the delayed payments.
For the Petitioner : Mr.M.Ravi
For the Respondents : Mr.VP.R. Elamparithi Additional Government Pleader
____________ Page 1 of 4_
W.P.No.8454 of 2024
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present writ petition.
05.06.2024 Index : Yes/No
drm
____________ Page 2 of 4_
W.P.No.8454 of 2024
To:
____________ Page 3 of 4_
W.P.No.8454 of 2024
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY,J.
(drm)
W.P.No.8454 of 2024
05.06.2024
____________ Page 4 of 4_
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.K. Manoharan
The Director of Municipal Administration
The Assistant Commissioner Ammapettai
D.BhARTA ChakraVArthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
