Disposed

M/S.Revathy Brick Works, v. the District Collector

Madras HC28 Mar 2024WP/8201/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed for mandatory compliance under Article 226 to direct the District Collector to dispose of a representation seeking renewal of a brick kiln registration. The High Court directed the respondent to consider the latest representation and pass necessary orders within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the District Collector to hear the petitioner and pass orders on the representation for renewal of the brick kiln license within four weeks.

M/S.Revathy Brick Works, Vs the District Collector — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

2024:MHC:1653

¶2

W.P.No.8201 of 2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶4

DATED: 28.03.2024

¶5

CORAM

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶7

W.P.No.8201 of 2024

¶8

M/s.Revathy Brick Works, Proprietor, V.Radhika W/o. S.Veeran (Late) No.3/96, Dr.Ambedkar Street, Pattabiram Via Poonamallee Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

¶9

.... Petitioner

¶10

¶11

1.The District Collector, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur.

¶12

2.The Tahsildar, Poonamallee Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

¶13

3.A.Perumal .... Respondents

¶14

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1^st respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 01.03.2024 and to issue a renewal certificate to the petitioner to run brick kiln situated in S.No.158/4B, 159/4, Korattur B Madura Sithukkadu Village, Poonamallee Taluk.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

W.P.No.8201 of 2024

¶18

For Petitioner : Ms.T.Gnana Banu

¶19

For Respondents : Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan (for R1 & R2) Additional Government Pleader

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan, learned Additional Government Pleader

¶22

accepts notice for the District Collector, Thiruvallur District/R1 and Tahsildar, Poonamallee Taluk/R2 and is armed with instructions to enable a final disposal of this Writ Petition.

¶23

The prayer of the petitioner is for a mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose her representation dated 01.03.2024 seeking renewal of certificate to enable her to run a brick kiln at S.No.158/4B, 159/4, Korattur B Madura Sithukkadu Village, Poonamallee Taluk ('property'/'property in question').

¶24

Mr.Gokul Krishnan would convey that the representation would be disposed in accordance with law. He is aware of order dated 08.11.2019 passed in W.P.No.22239 of 2018, where this petitioner had challenged order dated 28.07.2018 passed by R1 rejecting the application for temporary licence to the petitioner to run a brick kiln in the property in question. That impugned order had been passed by virtue of an impediment posed by a Suit filed by R3, both in that Writ Petition and in

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

2/4

¶27

W.P.No.8201 of 2024

¶28

the present Writ Petition.

¶29

At paragraph 10 of order dated 08.11.2019, the learned Judge has stated that if R3/plaintiff in O.S.No.401 of 2016 pending on the file of the District Munsif Court, Poonamallee succeeds in the suit, he is entitled to return of the property. Till then, to ensure proper utilization of the property in question which, at present, stands in the name of the petitioner, the pendency of the suit would not stand as an impediment. The Court has directed R1 to re-consider the rejection and grant temporary licence, provided all other requirements are fulfilled.

¶30

Learned Additional Government Pleader would confirm that order dated 28.07.2018 has been so re-considered and licence granted to the petitioner vide order dated 09.12.2019, which is effective till 16.04.2022.

¶31

At paragraph 11 of the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, the petitioner states that from May, 2022, she has been approaching the official respondents for renewal of registration but to no avail. Hence, this Writ Petition seeking disposal of her latest representation dated 01.03.2024.

¶32

In light of the order of this Court dated 08.11.2019, which has

¶33

attained finality, there appears to be no impediment for renewal of the

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

3/4

¶36

W.P.No.8201 of 2024

¶37

Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J.

¶38

licence. That apart, seeing as the petitioner states that she has been seeking the relief from May, 2022 and the last licence has expired on 16.04.2022, there should be no further delay in considering the representation of the petitioner dated 01.03.2024 seeking renewal of registration. Let R1 hear the petitioner and pass necessary orders having regard to order dated 08.11.2019, within a period of four (4) weeks from date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶39

This Writ Petition is disposed as above. No costs.

¶40

Sl Index:Yes/No Speaking order Neutral Citation:Yes

¶41

28.03.2024

¶42

¶43

1.The District Collector, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur.

¶44

2.The Tahsildar, Poonamallee Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

¶45

W.P.No.8201 of 2024

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

4/4

M/S.Revathy Brick Works, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Revathy Brick Works, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Meenakhisundaram Kumararaja Vs Superintending Engineer

Dr.C.Aruna M.D., Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

Dr.v.Ajay Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Karti P.Chidambaram Vs the Regional Passport Officer

P.a.Pharantaman Vs Government of Tamil Nadu

Dr.Danit E Jolly Vs the State of Tamil Nadu