Remanded

C.Adhilakshmi, v. the Commissioner

Madras HC25 Mar 2024WP/7967/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus for speedy disposal of a revision petition challenging her suspension as a Hereditary Trustee. The Court directed the Commissioner to ensure effective hearings, adhere to natural justice, and report compliance.

What did the court decide?

Directed the First Respondent to conduct effective hearings, afford natural justice, pass reasoned orders, and report compliance to the Registrar.

C.Adhilakshmi, Vs the Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P. No. 7967 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 25.03.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU

¶6

W.P. No. 7967 of 2024 and

¶7

W.M.P. Nos. 8932 and 8933 of 2024

¶8

C.Adhilakshmi … Petitioner

¶9

-vs-

¶10

The Commissioner

¶11

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department No. 119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai Nungambakkam

¶12

Chennai – 600034.

¶13

The Joint Commissioner

¶14

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department Kancheepuram, 11/20, A.K.Thangavelar Street Chinna Kancheepuram – 631501.

¶15

The Assistant Commissioner

¶16

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department Kancheepuram, Collector Office Campus Kancheepuram – 631501.

¶17

The Fit Person

¶18

Arulmigu Pavalavanar and Pachaivannar Swamy Temple Calendar Street, Kancheepuram.

¶19

Also, The Executive Officer Arulmigu Subramaniya Swamy Temple Kumarakottam, Kancheepuram. ... Respondents

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

1/6

¶22

W.P. No. 7967 of 2024

¶23

Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the First Respondent to dispose the Revision Petition in R.P. (filing) No. 385154 of 2024 along with the stay petition and the Transfer Petition in M.P. No. 7 of 2023 and within a fixed time frame.

¶24

For Respondents : Mr. N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, Special Government Pleader

¶25

O R D E R

¶26

Heard Mr. V.Srikanth, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and

¶27

Mr. N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, Learned Special Government Pleader, who takes

¶28

notice for the Respondents, and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings of the parties.

¶29

The Writ Petition has been filed for directing the First Respondent to consider the Revision Petition in R.P. (filing) No. 385154 of 2024 filed by the Petitioner against the Order in Se.Mu.Na.Ka. No. 3384/2021/Aa2 dated 29.02.2024 passed by the Second Respondent suspending the Petitioner from the post of Hereditary Trustee of Arulmigu Pavalavanar and Pachaivannar Swamy Temple, Calendar Street, Kancheepuram, along with the stay petition

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

2/6

¶32

W.P. No. 7967 of 2024

¶33

and the Transfer Petition in M.P. No. 7 of 2023 within the time frame that may be fixed by this Court.

¶34

Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the Respondents

¶35

states that hearing on the aforesaid Revision Petition filed by the Petitioner has fixed on 01.04.2024.

¶36

In such circumstances, this Court without expressing any view on the merits of the controversy involved in the matter, passes the following order:-

¶37

(i) it shall be incumbent upon the First Respondent to send due notice to the Petitioner, the Fourth Respondent and all other persons concerned to attend the hearing on the said date as well as on the subsequent dates to which it is adjourned and ensure that there are atleast two effective hearings every month showing progress of the case;

¶38

(ii) after affording full opportunity of hearing to all parties concerned following the prescribed procedure in consonance with the principles of natural justice, the First Respondent shall deal with each of the contentions raised and pass reasoned orders on merits and in accordance with law and communicate the decision taken to them under written acknowledgment; and

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

3/6

¶41

W.P. No. 7967 of 2024

¶42

(iii) the report of such compliance shall be filed before the Registrar (Judicial) of the Court.

¶43

In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed on the aforesaid terms. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs.

¶44

25.03.2024

¶45

Index: Yes/No NCC: Yes/No

¶46

Note: Issue order copy by 22.05.2024.

¶47

Maya

¶48

¶49

The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department No. 119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai Nungambakkam

¶50

Chennai – 600034.

¶51

The Joint Commissioner

¶52

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department Kancheepuram, 11/20, A.K.Thangavelar Street Chinna Kancheepuram – 631501.

¶53

The Assistant Commissioner

¶54

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department Kancheepuram, Collector Office Campus Kancheepuram – 631501.

¶55

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶56

4/6

¶57

W.P. No. 7967 of 2024

¶58

The Fit Person

¶59

Arulmigu Pavalavanar and Pachaivannar Swamy Temple Calendar Street, Kancheepuram.

¶60

Also, The Executive Officer Arulmigu Subramaniya Swamy Temple Kumarakottam, Kancheepuram.

¶61

Copy to

¶62

The Registrar (Judicial), Madras High Court, Chennai – 600104.

¶63

C.Adhilakshmi, W/o. Balaji, No. 12A, Calender Street, Big Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram – 631 502.

¶64

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶65

5/6

¶66

W.P. No. 7967 of 2024

¶67

P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J.

¶68

Maya

¶69

W.P. No. 7967 of 2024

¶70

25.03.2024

¶71

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶72

6/6

C.Adhilakshmi, v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Adhilakshmi, v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Govindarasan Vs the Deputy Registrar of Co-Operative Credit Societies

Metro City House Owners Welfare Vs the District Collector

M.Javith Ali Vs the Chief Executive Officer

Jamuna Vs the Commissioner

D.Rameshkumar Vs the District Collector

A.Sasikala Vs Tamil Nadu Wakf Board