Disposed

Marson Industries v. Deputy Commercial Tax officer

Madras HC10 Apr 2024WP/7922/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Challenge to two GST assessment orders relating only to interest liability for 2018-2019 and 2019-2020, issued without hearing the petitioner after notices were uploaded on the GST portal. The court set aside both orders and remanded for fresh consideration with a personal hearing.

What did the court decide?

Impugned orders dated 17.03.2023 set aside; matters remanded to respondent for reconsideration with opportunity of personal hearing; no order as to costs.

Marson Industries Vs Deputy Commercial Tax officer — GST and Indirect Tax | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.Nos.7922 & 7941 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 10.04.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶6

W.P.Nos.7922 & 7941 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.8892, 8894, 8918 & 8920 of 2024

¶7

In both WPs.

¶8

Marson Industries, Represented by Proprietor, Shri M.Madaiyan, Plot No.42, Sipcot Phase-II, Main Road, Mornapalli Circle, Krishnagiri-635 109.

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

Vs.

¶11

Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Hosur (South)-II, Hosur-635 109.

¶12

... Respondent

¶13

Prayer in W.P.No.7922 of 2024: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the respondent's order bearing Reference No.ZD330323085134Q dated 17.03.2023 for the year 2019-2020 and quash the same.

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/5

¶16

W.P.Nos.7922 & 7941 of 2024

¶17

Prayer in W.P.No.7941 of 2024: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the respondent's order bearing Reference No.ZD330323084969Y dated 17.03.2023 for the year 2018-2019 and quash the same.

¶18

In both WPs.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.Adithya Reddy

¶20

For Respondent : Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik, Additional Government Pleader (T)

¶21

C O M M O N O R D E R

¶22

By these two writ petitions, orders dated 17.03.2023 pertaining to

¶23

assessment periods 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 are challenged.

¶24

The petitioner asserts that he was unaware of proceedings

¶25

culminating in the impugned orders because the show cause notice and assessment order were uploaded on the “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab on the GST portal and not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode.

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/5

¶28

W.P.Nos.7922 & 7941 of 2024

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioner refers to Form GSTR DRC-03

¶30

dated 23.05.2023 & 30.03.2023, respectively and points out that interest liability to the extent of Rs.88,028/- & Rs.3,05,551/-, respectively were discharged. He further submits that amounts were available in the electronic credit ledger of the petitioner and that the petitioner be provided an opportunity to contest the interest liability on merits.

¶31

Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice for the respondent. On examining the documents placed on record, it appears that the impugned orders were issued without hearing the petitioner. The petitioner has also placed on record the payment receipt pertaining to the payments of Rs.88,028/- & 3,05,551/-, respectively. The impugned orders relate only to interest. In these circumstances, it is just and appropriate that the petitioner be provided an opportunity to contest the interest liability on merits.

¶32

Therefore, the orders impugned herein dated 17.03.2023 are set

¶33

aside and the matters are remanded to the respondent for reconsideration. The petitioner is permitted to submit a reply to the show cause notices within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/5

¶34

W.P.Nos.7922 & 7941 of 2024

¶35

Upon receipt thereof, the respondent is directed to provide a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, including a personal hearing, and thereafter issue fresh orders within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the petitioner's reply.

¶36

These writ petitions are disposed of on the above terms without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶37

10.04.2024

¶38

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No

¶39

¶40

¶41

Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Hosur (South)-II, Hosur-635 109.

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

4/5

¶44

W.P.Nos.7922 & 7941 of 2024

¶45

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J.

¶46

¶47

W.P.Nos.7922 & 7941 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.8892, 8894, 8918 & 8920 of 2024

¶48

10.04.2024

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶50

5/5

Marson Industries v. Deputy Commercial Tax officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Marson Industries v. Deputy Commercial Tax officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shriniwas Impex Vs the State Tax Officer

Basf Catalysts India Private Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner (St) -I

G Krishnaveni alias D.S.Kumari, Vs the Commissioner

National Inspection And Technical Services Vs The Asst. Commissioner (St)

Ms Ravi Kumar Distilleries Limited, Vs the Assistant Commissioner

Tvl.Mss Projects Vs the Assistant Commissioner (St)