B.Aranganathan v. The Assistant Engineer
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-bench order where the High Court of Madras closed a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking mandamus to stop or withdraw an electricity connection granted to a third respondent, noting grievances were redressed via a civil court decree.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition stands closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.6858 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.01.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.6858 of 2020
and W.M.P.No.8169 of 2020
B.Aranganathan
... Petitioner
Vs.
- The Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO (Previously know as Tamil Nadu Electric Board) Mangadu, Chennai - 600 122, Kancheepuram District.
- The Assistant Divisional Engineer, TANGEDCO (Previously know as Tamil Nadu Electric Board) Iyyapanthangal, Porur, Chennai - 600 116, Kancheepuram District.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
B.Aranganathan
- respondent
Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO
- respondent
Assistant Divisional Engineer, TANGEDCO
- respondent
Arasappan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court