Disposed

G.Govindasamy v. The Director of Medical Education

Madras HC28 Mar 2024WP/6751/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging a transfer order and consequential order linked to a disciplinary charge memo against a medical employee. The petitioner had joined the transferred place; enquiry report and explanation were on record but no final order was passed. The court directed the first respondent to pass final orders on the charge memo within eight weeks and disposed of the petition.

What the court decided

AI extract

G.Govindasamy Vs The Director of Medical Education — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.6751 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 28.03.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

W.P.No.6751 of 2023 and WMP.Nos.6821 & 6825 of 2023

¶7

G.Govindasamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai-10 2.The Dean, Govt. Medical College ESI Hospital, Coimbatore-15 ... Respondents

¶8

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the first respondent in reference No.110128/E2/3/2022 dated 10.02.2023 and the consequential order of the 2^nd respondent in reference No.9866/E4/2023 dated 16.02.2023 and quash the same and direct the respondents to retain the petitioner in the same station at Coimbatore.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Venkataramani, Senior Counsel for Mr.M.Muthappan For Respondents : Mr.M.Brindan, Additional Government Pleader

¶10

1/4

¶11

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶12

W.P.No.6751 of 2023

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This writ petition has been filed challenging the order of the

¶15

first respondent in reference No.110128/E2/3/2022 dated 10.02.2023 and

¶16

the consequential order of the 2^nd respondent in reference No.9866/E4/2023 dated 16.02.2023 and consequently to direct the respondents to retain the petitioner in the same station at Coimbatore.

¶17

Though the writ petition has been challenging the order of transfer in pursuant to the issuance of charge memo, now the petitioner has joined in the transferred place. That apart, in pursuant to the charge memo, enquiry was conducted and submitted enquiry report. The petitioner also submitted explanation for the enquiry report. However, final order has not been passed so far.

¶18

Therefore, the first respondent, who is being the disciplinary

¶19

authority, is directed to pass final order on the charge memo 30.12.2022

¶20

within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶21

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

W.P.No.6751 of 2023

¶23

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

¶24

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶25

28.03.2024

¶26

Internet: Yes Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order lok

¶27

¶28

1.The Director of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai-10 2.The Dean, Govt. Medical College ESI Hospital, Coimbatore-15

¶29

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.No.6751 of 2023

¶31

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

lok

W.P.No.6751 of 2023

28.03.2024

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

G.Govindasamy v. The Director of Medical Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

G.Govindasamy v. The Director of Medical Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Chandramohan and another Vs P.Sivasankaran Ias.

Mrs.R.S.Isabella Vs the Chairman

C.Thannasi Vs Teachers Recruitment board

K.Kumaresan Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

S.Rajendran, Vs the Managing Director

R.Santhamoorthy, Vs the Managing Director