This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.6722 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.03.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
W.P.No. 6722 of 2024
S.Ranjankumar
... Petitioner
versus
The District Registrar, O/o.The District Registrar, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri. .....Respondent
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.12.2023.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.R.Neethiperumal Government Advocate
Pg.Nos.1/3
W.P.No.6722 of 2024
O R D E R
Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
15.03.2024
Index: Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No ms
To The District Registrar, O/o.The District Registrar, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.
Pg.Nos.2/3
W.P.No.6722 of 2024
P.VELMURUGAN, J.
ms
W.P.No.6722 of 2024
15.03.2024
Pg.Nos.3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Ranjankumar
The District Registrar, O/o.The District Registrar, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri
P.Velmurugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
