R.Ganesan, v. Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner failed to appear despite listing directions. Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution, holding the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the matter.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
What the court decided
W.P.No.6563 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 30.01.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.6563 of 2018
R.Ganesan ... Petitioner
Vs. 1.Tahsildar, Ponneri Taluk, Tiruvallur District. 2. D.Mohan ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, di recting the 1st respondent to dispose of the representation dated 25.07.2012 submitted by the petitioner for which enquiry was conducted on 24.08.2012.
For Petitioner : No appearance For R1 : Mr.P.Balathandayutham, Special Government Pleader For R2 : Not ready in notice
Page 1 of 4
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Ganesan
- respondent
Tahsildar, Ponneri Taluk, Tiruvallur District
- respondent
D.Mohan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court