Writ petition seeking action on a complaint of professional misconduct against an advocate. The Bar Council stated the advocate was not on its State Roll but was enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi; the court disposed of the petition granting liberty to file a fresh complaint there.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.6122 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.07.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W.P.No.6122 of 2023
G.Dhinakaran
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Rep. by the Inspector of Police P-5, M.K.B. Nagar Police Station Chennai .
.. Respondents
Page 1 of 5
W.P.No.6122 of 2023
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.11.2021 and to verify the certificates and to take necessary action as against the sixth respondent.
For the Petitioner : Mr.K.Thenrajan
For the Respondents : Mr.M.R.Jothimanian for R1
Mr.S.R.Raghunathan for R2
R3 to R6 not ready in notice
ORDER
(Delivered by the Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.M.SUBRAMANIAM)
The complaint filed by the petitioner against the sixth respondent Advocate regarding professional misconduct not being taken into consideration resulted in filing of the present writ petition.
the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry would submit that the name of the sixth respondent is not in the State Roll of the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry.
Page 2 of 5
W.P.No.6122 of 2023
Council of Delhi. The petitioner has already addressed a complaint to the Bar Council of Delhi. That being so, he is at liberty to send a complaint once again to the Bar Council of Delhi for initiation of appropriate action by following the due process.
(S.M.S., J.) (C.K., J.) 09.07.2024 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No
drm
Page 3 of 5
W.P.No.6122 of 2023
To:
Page 4 of 5
W.P.No.6122 of 2023
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
AND C.KUMARAPPAN, J.
(drm)
W.P.No.6122 of 2023
09.07.2024
Page 5 of 5
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry should act on the petitioner's complaint of professional misconduct against an advocate enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G.Dhinakaran
The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry
The Bar Council of Delhi
The Principal S.B.R.T.M. Law College, Kadappa Andhra Pradesh
The Director General of Police
A.Prem Kumar
S.M.Subramaniam
C.Kumarappan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
