Allowed

Eswari v. the District Collector

Madras HC7 Mar 2024WP/5902/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the respondents to disregard the requirement for a No Objection Certificate from other deceased employees' legal heirs regarding the comprehensive group insurance payout. The court ordered an enquiry and directed the disbursement of the deceased member's share to the petitioners within six weeks if they are legally entitled.

What did the court decide?

Direction to issue notice to all legal heirs, conduct enquiry, and disburse the insurance share to petitioners without No Objection Certificate within six weeks.

Eswari Vs the District Collector — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.5902 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 07.03.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

W.P.No.5902 of 2024

¶7

Eswari

¶8

Ranjitha ... Petitioners

¶9

-Vs-

¶10

The District Collector, Collectorate, Salem,

¶11

Salem District.

¶12

The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayat), Sankari, Salem District.

¶13

Kaveripatti Agragaram Village Panchayat, represented by its President, Sankari Panchayat Union, Kaveripatti Agraharam, Salem District.

¶14

P.Prakash

¶15

Revathi ... Respondents

¶16

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to apportion and disburse the comprehensive group insurance amount stood in the name of petitioner husband late K.Perumal who died in harness on 15.01.2020, by considering their representation dated 06.11.2023.

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Page 1 of 6

¶19

W.P.No.5902 of 2024

¶20

For Petitioners : Mr.N.Manoharan For R1 : Mrs.R.L.Karthika Government Advocate For R2 and R3 : Mr.T.M.Rajangam Government Advocate

¶21

ORDER

¶22

This writ petition has been filed for direction directing the respondents 1

¶23

to 3 to apportion and disburse the comprehensive group insurance amount stood in the name of petitioner husband late K.Perumal who died in harness on 15.01.2020, by considering their representation dated 06.11.2023.

¶24

Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶25

The petitioner's husband one K.Perumal, was working as Pump Operator in the overhead water tank in the third respondent Panchayat. The petitioner's husband initially got married with one Eswari. Through the first wife, he gave birth to the respondents 4 and 5. After the demise of first wife, he

¶26

got married with the first petitioner, in the year 1995. Through the first petitioner, he gave birth to the second petitioner, who is a mentally retarded

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

Page 2 of 6

¶29

W.P.No.5902 of 2024

¶30

child. When the petitioner's husband was alive, during his course of employment, he had paid contribution towards the comprehensive health insurance scheme. Therefore, the legal heirs of the deceased K.Perumal are entitled to get the amount from the comprehensive health insurance scheme. Therefore, the petitioners approached the respondents 1 to 3 to extend the benefits of health insurance scheme to them. However, the first petitioner was directed to obtain No Objection Certificate from the respondents 4 and 5. The respondents 4 and 5 refused to give No Objection Certificate, since they are not in need of money. According to the petitioners, the respondents 4 and 5 are expecting the petitioners to die and after that, they plan to receive the entire amount. The first petitioner could not maintain her family, since the second petitioner is a mentally retarded person. Therefore, the petitioners submitted a representation to disburse their share from the comprehensive health insurance amount, which stood in the name of the first petitioner's husband.

¶31

Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the respondents are directed to issue notice to the respondents 4 and 5 and conduct enquiry and pass orders to disburse the share of the comprehensive health insurance amount stood in the name of first petitioner's husband late

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

Page 3 of 6

¶34

W.P.No.5902 of 2024

¶35

K.Perumal, to the petitioners, without insisting any No Objection Certificate from the respondents 4 and 5, if they are entitled for the said amount, within a

¶36

period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶37

With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. There

¶38

shall be no order as to costs.

¶39

07.03.2024 (½)

¶40

Internet: Yes Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order mn

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 4 of 6

¶42

W.P.No.5902 of 2024

¶43

¶44

The District Collector, Collectorate, Salem, Salem District.

¶45

The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayat), Sankari, Salem District.

¶46

The President, Kaveripatti Agragaram Village Panchayat, Sankari Panchayat Union, Kaveripatti Agraharam, Salem District.

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 5 of 6

¶48

W.P.No.5902 of 2024

¶49

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J,

W.P.No.5902 of 2024

07.03.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 6 of 6

Eswari v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Eswari v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Sabika Vs the State of Tamiilnadu

V.Koorthalvar, Vs the Secretary to Government

R.Selvaraj Vs the Member Secretary

M.Duropathiammal Vs Government of Tamilnadu

M.Duropathiammal Vs Government of Tamilnadu

K.Raghuraman Vs the Member Secretary