Disposed

K.Krishnakumar, v. the Project Director

Madras HC5 Mar 2024WP/5686/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition regarding blocked access to acquired agricultural land, the Madras High Court did not grant immediate access but directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation on merits within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Mandamus issued directing the respondent to hear the petitioner and consider the request under a representation dated 23.11.2023 on merits within two weeks.

K.Krishnakumar, Vs the Project Director — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

2024:MHC:1135

¶2

W.P.No.5686 of 2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶4

Dated: 05.03.2024

¶5

CORAM

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶7

W.P.No.5686 of 2024

K.Krishnakumar

.... Petitioner

The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, Project Implementation Unit Puducherry (NH-45A), No.28 & 29, 1^st Cross Street, Ganapathy Nagar, Arumparthapuram, Puducherry-605110.

¶12

.... Respondent

¶13

PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

¶14

praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to provide access from the National Highway NH45A to the lands of the petitioner in Kothattai Village, Bhuvanagiri Taluk, Cuddalore District.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Baskar For Respondent : Mr.V.Ashok Kumar for Mr.Su.Srinivasan Standing Counsel

¶16

1 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.No.5686 of 2024

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

Mr.V.Ashok Kumar, learned counsel on behalf of Mr.Su.Srinivasan,

¶20

learned Standing Counsel accepts notice for the sole respondent/Project Director, National Highways Authority of India and is armed with instructions

¶21

to enable final disposal of this Writ Petition, even at the stage of admission.

¶22

The petitioner claims to be the owner of the following property (in

¶23

short 'property'/'property in question').

¶24

*Sl.No.*	*New S.No.*	*Extent*
		*Hec. Ares*
1	66/4B	0.20.68
2	66/4C1	0.07.00
3	66/4C2	0.07.00
4	66/5A	0.03.00
5	66/5B	0.03.00
6	66/5C	0.16.50

¶25

The petitioner also claims to be in possession of the same, raising

¶26

Eucalyptus plants thereupon. The property in question has been acquired by the respondent for the expansion of National Highway NH45A. Some portions of the petitioner's land are also stated to have been acquired.

¶27

The petitioner is aggrieved by the construction of a barricade along

¶28

side the property acquired by him which, according to him, has blocked the

¶29

2 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.No.5686 of 2024

¶31

access to the property in question. He claims that once the toll shed is completed and the fence laid, for which preparations are on-going, there will be no access to the property in question at all. The petitioner has made a representation on 23.11.2023 to the respondent (page 36 of the typed set) in this regard.

¶32

In light of the fact that it is for the respondent to look into the factual assertions of the petitioner and address the request of the petitioner properly, the relief sought for by the petitioner is moulded. The petitioner has sought a mandamus directing the respondent to provide access to the property in question from National Highways NH45A. Instead, this Court prefers to leave the adjudication on the request of the petitioner to the sole respondent.

¶33

Hence, mandamus is issued to the sole respondent to hear the petitioner

¶34

and consider his request under representation dated 23.11.2023 on merits and in

¶35

accordance with law, within a period of two (2) weeks from today.

¶36

This Writ Petition is disposed as above. No costs.

¶37

05.03.2024

¶38

Index : Yes/No Speaking Order:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes sl

¶39

Note: Registry is directed to issue this order on or before 08.03.2024.

¶40

3 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

W.P.No.5686 of 2024

¶42

DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.

¶43

¶44

¶45

The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, Project Implementation Unit Puducherry (NH-45A), No.28 & 29, 1^st Cross Street, Ganapathy Nagar, Arumparthapuram, Puducherry-605110.

¶46

W.P.No.5686 of 2024

¶47

05.03.2024

¶48

4 / 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

K.Krishnakumar, v. the Project Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Krishnakumar, v. the Project Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Star Plastics, Vs Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limtied

Santhakumari, Vs the Directorate of Public Health

Dr.S.Sathish Kumar Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

S.Baskaran Vs the Secretary to Government

M/S.Agp Yarn Private Limited Vs the Director

Dr.Ebin Jose Vs the State of Tamil Nadu