Disposed
G.Rajmohan v. The Commissioner
Madras HCWP/5644/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ to conduct a festival exclusively. Court closed the petition as private respondents filed appeals after out-of-court resolution.
What did the court decide?
None required as petitioner had achieved the relief sought out of court.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
W.P. No.5644 of 2017
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶3
DATED: 04.09.2024
¶4
CORAM:
¶5
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
¶6
W.P. No.5644 of 2017
¶7
and
¶8
W.M.P. Nos.6028 and 6029 of 2017
¶9
G. Rajmohan
¶10
... Petitioner
¶11
Versus
¶12
- The Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowment Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. 2. The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowment Department, Salem Division, O/o. Joint Commissioner, Salem District – 1.
¶13
- The Executive Officer, A/m. Badrakaliamman Temple, Mecheri, Mettur Taluk, Salem District – 636 453. 4. The Fit Person / Assistant Commissioner, A/m. Badrakaliamman Temple, Mecheri, Mettur Taluk, Salem District – 636 453. Also the Executive Officer / Assistant Commissioner, A/m. Narasimhassamy Temple, Namakkal District.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
G. Rajmohan
- respondent
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowment Department
Coram
AI extract
M.DHANDAPANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court