Disposed

S.Bahadur Sait v. the District Collector

Madras HC19 Mar 2024WP/559/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras disposed of a writ petition seeking disqualification of two individuals from panchayat posts based on allegations of misconduct. The court rejected the objections after the First Respondent stated there was no evidence for the allegations, advising the petitioner to approach the proper forum.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition and connected miscellaneous petition disposed. No orders in the nature of relief.

S.Bahadur Sait Vs the District Collector — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P. No. 559 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 19.03.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU

¶6

W.P. No. 559 of 2024 and

¶7

W.M.P. No. 549 of 2024

S. Bahadur Sait

… Petitioner

-vs-

The District Collector, Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu 603 001.

¶12

The Tahsildar, Cheyyur Taluk, Chengalpattu District 603 302.

¶13

The Block Development Officer, Chithamur Block Development Officer, Chithamur Panchayat Union, Chengalpattu District.

¶14

Elumalai, Chairman, Chithamur Panchayat Union, Chithamur Village and Post, Cheyyur Taluk, Chengalpattu District.

¶15

E.Vijayakumar

¶16

Nagappan

¶17

N.Anjalidevi

¶18

... Respondents

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

1/6

¶21

W.P. No. 559 of 2024

¶22

Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the First Respondent to consider the representation dated 14.09.2023 made by the Petitioner in accordance with law, so as to take action against the Fourth and Sixth Respondents and disqualify them from holding any posts of Chithamur Panchayat Union and Perunkaranai Panchayat, Chengalpattu District.

¶23

For Petitioner : Mr.W.M.Abdul Majeed For Respondents : Mr.P.Ganesan, (for R1 & R2) Additional Government Pleader Mr.P.Balathandayutham (for R3)

¶24

No appearance (for R4 to R6) Mr.B.Devakumar (for R7)

¶25

O R D E R

¶26

Heard Mr.W.M.Abdul Majeed, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner,

¶27

Mr.P.Ganesan, Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the First and Second Respondents, Mr.P.Balathandayutham, Learned Counsel appearing for the Third Respondent and Mr.B.Devakumar, Learned Counsel appearing for the Seventh Respondent and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings of the parties.

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

2/6

¶30

W.P. No. 559 of 2024

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

3/6

¶33

W.P. No. 559 of 2024

¶34

The Writ Petition has been filed directing the First Respondent to take action against the Fourth and Sixth Respondents and disqualify them from holding any posts in Chithamur Panchayat Union, Chengalpattu District by considering the representation dated 14.09.2023 made by the Petitioner.

¶35

In furtherance to the order passed by this Court on 19.01.2024, the First Respondent has filed Status Report dated 19.02.2024 stating that there was no evidence for the allegations made by the Petitioner. In view of the same, nothing remains for further consideration in the Writ Petition, but if the Petitioner still has any grievance to be redressed in the matter, he is not precluded from working out his remedies before the proper forum in the manner recognized by law.

¶36

In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed with the aforesaid observations. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

¶37

19.03.2024

¶38

Index: Yes/No NCC: Yes/No

¶39

Note: Issue order copy by 22.04.2024.

¶40

gsa

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

4/6

¶43

W.P. No. 559 of 2024

¶44

¶45

The District Collector, Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu 603 001.

¶46

The Tahsildar, Cheyyur Taluk, Chengalpattu District 603 302.

¶47

The Block Development Officer, Chithamur Block Development Officer, Chithamur Panchayat Union, Chengalpattu District.

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶49

5/6

¶50

W.P. No. 559 of 2024

¶51

P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J.

¶52

gsa

¶53

W.P. No. 559 of 2024

¶54

19.03.2024

¶55

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶56

6/6

S.Bahadur Sait v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Bahadur Sait v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Natarajar Thuluva Vellalar Vs the Joint Commissioner

Perumal Babu Vs the Commissioner

A/m. Om Sri Bhavani Amman Vs The District Collector

K.Krishna Vel Vs the Commissioner

Nandhagopal Vs the Commissioner

S. Kandhasamy Vs the Commissioner