C.P.Jain v. The Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Pawn brokers challenged a show cause notice issued by the Tahsildar, Guindy Taluk. At hearing, counsel sought leave to withdraw with an endorsement; the writ petitions were dismissed as withdrawn and miscellaneous petitions closed, without costs.
What the court decided
W.P.Nos.537 & 544 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.06.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
W.P.Nos.537 & 544 of 2021 W.M.P.Nos.591 & 597 of 2021
C.P.Jain Pawn Broker Rep. by its Proprietor V.Chetan Prakash, 21/6, South Usman Road, Hotel Aruna Building, T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 007. ... Petitioner in W.P. No.537 of 2021
Asha Jain Gold Loan, Rep. by its Proprietor Asha Jain Old No.2, New No.3, North Usman Road, Nandhi Statue, West CIT Nagar, Chennai – 600 035. ... Petitioner in W.P. No.544 of 2021
-Vs-
- The Tahsildar Guindy Taluk, Office of the Tahsildar, Guindy Taluk, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.P.Jain Pawn Broker, Rep. by its Proprietor V.Chetan Prakash
- petitioner
Asha Jain Gold Loan, Rep. by its Proprietor Asha Jain
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Guindy Taluk
- respondent
The Official Assignee, High Court, Madras
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court