Dismissed

J.Elangovan v. The Registrar

Madras HC5 Jun 2024WP/5056/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner sought a writ of Mandamus directing the Registrar of Annamalai University to initiate enquiry into the awarding of a Ph.D. degree to the petitioner's separated wife alleging plagiarism. The Court dismissed the petition, holding it devoid of merit and noting the petitioner lacked locus standi to challenge the academic eval

What did the court decide?

No relief granted. Writ petition dismissed with no order as to costs.

J.Elangovan Vs The Registrar — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.5056 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 05.06.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

W.P.No.5056 of 2021

¶7

J.Elangovan ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Registrar, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Cuddalore District

¶10

2.Dr.Sudha

¶11

3.Tamilarasi ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India p raying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.01.2021 by holding enquiry into the misconduct of the second respondent by practicing plagiarism in awarding Ph.D Degree in favour of the third respondent herein.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.C.K.M.Appaji

¶14

For Respondents For R1 : Mr.S.Sithirai Anandam, Standing Counsel

¶15

1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.No.5056 of 2021

¶17

For R2 : Mr.T.Dharani For R3 : Mr.S.Saravana Kumar

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This writ petition has been filed for direction to the first

¶20

respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 12.01.2021 seeking action as against the second respondent in respect of awarding Ph.D. in favour of the third respondent.

¶21

The petitioner got married the third respondent and subsequently they got separated. Thereafter, they also obtained divorce decree before the court of law. The petitioner submitted representation seeking action as against the second respondent in respect of awarding Ph.D. degree in favour of the third respondent alleging that the third respondent was an average student during school and college days. The second respondent and the third respondent colluded together and indulged in corrupt practice thereby awarding Ph.D. degree in favour of the third respondent. It is seen that since the petitioner got separated from

¶22

2/6

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.No.5056 of 2021

¶25

the third respondent, in order to wreak vengeance as against the third respondent, he made representation as against the second and third respondents.

¶26

On perusal of counter filed by the first respondent revealed

¶27

that the third respondent had joined Ph.D. programme in the Department of Economics in the first respondent University on 08.11.2010 under full time mode under the guidance of the second respondent. The third respondent had submitted her Ph.D. thesis entitled “Economic Valuation of Women's Unpaid Work: A Study in Villupuram District, Tamilnadu” on 07.11.2017. She had also completed viva-voce examination on 13.07.2018 as per the University guidelines. Therefore, there is no violation of University Rules at the time submission and the date of award of Ph.D. degree to the third respondent.

¶28

That apart, the petitioner has no locus to challenge the awarding of Ph.D. degree in favour of the third respondent. If any irregularity or illegality committed during the award of Ph.D. degree in favour of the third respondent, the first respondent is there to look after.

¶29

3/6

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

W.P.No.5056 of 2021

¶32

In view of the above, this writ petition is devoid of merits

¶33

and liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶34

05.06.2024 Neutral citation: Yes/No Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order lok

¶35

¶36

4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

W.P.No.5056 of 2021

¶38

To The Registrar, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Cuddalore District

¶39

5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

W.P.No.5056 of 2021

¶41

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

lok

W.P.No.5056 of 2021

05.06.2024

6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

J.Elangovan v. The Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J.Elangovan v. The Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arumugam Vs The District Collector

R.Gowri Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

D.Selvaraju Vs The Branch Manager

Chiril Raj Vs State by

M.Sumathi Vs The District Revenue officer

Muthammal Vs L.R.Levinprabhu Iras.