This High Court disposed of a writ petition filed to prevent the relocation of a TASMAC shop. The Court held the petition premature as the order to relocate had not been issued, directing the petitioner to raise objections before authorities.
No order as to costs. Petition disposed as premature, directing petitioner to raise objections before authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.465 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.01.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.P.No.465 of 2024
P.Moorthy .. Petitioner
Vs.
.. Respondents
Page 1 of 4
W.P.No.465 of 2024
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents not to re-locate the TASMAC shop No.3890 at State Highways from Erode to Palani in S.No.243 in Patta No.733 at Nathakadaiyur, Mullipuram Village, Kangayam Taluk, Tiruppur District – 638 108.
For the Petitioner : Mr.A.Tamilarasan For the Respondents : Mr.P.Muthukumar State Government Pleader for R1, R4 and R5 Mr.K.Balakrishnan for R2 and R3
ORDER
(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Heard Mr.A.Tamilarasan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.P.Muthukumar, learned State Government Pleader for respondents 1, 4 and 5 and Mr.K.Balakrishnan, learned counsel for respondent 2 and 3.
Page 2 of 4
W.P.No.465 of 2024
(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 10.01.2024 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No
drm
To
Page 3 of 4
W.P.No.465 of 2024
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
(drm)
W.P.No.465 of 2024
10.01.2024
Page 4 of 4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition to restrain relocation of a TASMAC shop is maintainable when the order has not been passed.
Whether the aggrieved party is directed to raise objections before the concerned authorities.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Moorthy
The District Collector
The District Manager Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation
The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd.
The Tahsildar
The Village Administrative Officer
Sanjay V. Gangapurwala
D. Bharatha Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
