Allowed

S.Abinaya v. the State Represented by Its

Madras HC6 Mar 2024WP/4175/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking ordinary leave for a convict detained at Central Prison, Cuddalore to arrange funds for family property partition. On a positive Probation Officer's report and the prisoner's eligibility, the court granted 28 days' ordinary leave with reporting conditions.

What did the court decide?

Ordinary leave granted to Convict No.15095 for 28 days (11.03.2024–08.04.2024), with weekly police reporting conditions.

S.Abinaya Vs the State Represented by Its — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.4175 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 06.03.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

¶6

W.P.No.4175 of 2024

S.Abinaya

...Petitioner

vs.

The State represented by its, 1.The Secretary to the Government of Tamil nadu, Department of Home, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

¶11

2.The Director Inspector General of Prison, Vellore Range, Central Prison Vellore, Vellore-632 002. 3.The Superintendent, Central Prison Cuddalore, Cuddalore-607 004. ...Respondents

¶12

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,

¶13

_____________ Page 1 of 6_

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.No.4175 of 2024

¶16

praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 40 days without escort to the detenue, N.Rajasekar, S/o.Navaneetham, aged about 44 years, Convict No.15095, detained at Central Prison, Cuddalore.

¶17

For Petitioner : Dr.S.Manoharan For Respondents : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by C.Aravind

¶18

ORDER

¶19

(Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH,J. )

¶20

The prayer in the present writ petition is for grant of ordinary leave for 40 days for the petitioner's father viz., N.Rajasekar, S/o.Navaneetham, aged

¶21

about 44 years, Convict No.15095, detained at Central Prison, Cuddalore.

¶22

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor produced the Probation

¶23

Officer's report dated 04.03.2024, in which it is stated that the reason cited by the petitioner, that the petitioner's presence was required to arrange funds to partition their family property, is true.

¶24

Page 2 of 6

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P.No.4175 of 2024

¶27

In view of the positive report of the Probation Officer, dated

¶28

04.03.2024, and also by taking note of the fact that the Convict Prisoner is eligible for grant of ordinary leave for 28 days, we are inclined to allow the writ petition.

¶29

Therefore, in exercise of our powers, we permit the petitioner's father / prisoner i.e., N.Rajasekar, S/o.Navaneetham, aged about 44 years, Convict No.15095, to avail Ordinary Leave for a period of 28 days on the following conditions.

¶30

(i) Respondents are directed to release the Convict Prisoner viz., N.Rajasekar, S/o.Navaneetham, aged about 44 years, Convict No.15095, on Ordinary Leave for a period of 28 days i.e., from 11.03.2024 to 08.04.2024.

¶31

(ii) The Convict Prisoner shall be released on 11.03.2024 at 10.00 am and surrender before the Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison Cuddalore, Cuddalore-607 004, on 08.04.2024 at 05.30 p.m.

¶32

(iii) The Convict Prisoner is directed to report before the Thalainayar Police Station, Nagapattinam, once a week i.e., on every Monday at 10.30 a.m, during the period of

¶33

_____________ Page 3 of 6_

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

W.P.No.4175 of 2024

¶36

leave.

¶37

(iv) The Convict Prisoner shall utilize the leave only for the ground on which it has been granted and shall not indulge in any other activities.

¶38

With the above directions, the writ petition stands allowed.

¶39

(M.S.R.,J.) (S.M.,J.) 06.03.2024

¶40

Note to Registry:

¶41

1. Issue order copy by 07.03.2024.

¶42

2. Upload the order copy forthwith.

¶43

Anu

¶44

Page 4 of 6

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

W.P.No.4175 of 2024

¶47

Copy to:

¶48

The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

¶49

The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Coimbatore Range, Coimbatore-18.

¶50

The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Salem-7.

¶51

4.The Inspector of Police, Thalainayar Police Station, Nagapattinam

¶52

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶53

Page 5 of 6

¶54

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶55

W.P.No.4175 of 2024

¶56

M.S.RAMESH,J. AND SUNDER MOHAN,J.

Anu

W.P.No.4175 of 2024

06.03.2024

_____________ Page 6 of 6_

¶61

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.Abinaya v. the State Represented by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Abinaya v. the State Represented by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suraj Raj Vs the State Rep. by Its

V.Murali Vs Superintendent of Police

Kamaraj Vs Inspector of Police

Perumal Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

Tada Aslam Vs Inspector of Police

K.P.Mohammed Faisal Vs the State Rep by Its